On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 02:43:24PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> It should be relatively straight forward for Devotee to find the
> winner, take the winner out of contention the next round, find the next
> winner (ignoring any pairwise contests dealing with any candidate no
> longer i
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
..
I have seen no discussion on how the soc ctte is going to go
about ensuring that such cultural differences are noticed, or taken
into account in the resolution process; or that any thought has been
taken to address cultural diversity in the dispute resol
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not sure I agree that Debian as the melting pot is a viable
> idea. And I find the concept of cultural hegemony (in other words,
> Debian culture is dictated by the predominant subgroups, everyone else
> better fall in line) mildly dis
Richard Hecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> ..
>> I have seen no discussion on how the soc ctte is going to go
>> about ensuring that such cultural differences are noticed, or taken
>> into account in the resolution process; or that any thought has been
>>
Richard Hecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Are we planning on taking into account things like cultural
> > differences? Or is the decision going to be that the majority rule (or
> > the dominant culture) be the governing one?
>
> I hope the committee will cons
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le vendredi 29 juin 2007 à 15:51 +0200, Robert Millan a écrit :
> > Sven also told me that if nobody will forward it, he will "make it by the
> > slashdot way".
>
> We don't negociate with terrorists.
That's daft. If you leave people with no outlet, t
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 10:00:47AM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 02:43:24PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > It should be relatively straight forward for Devotee to find the
> > winner, take the winner out of contention the next round, find the next
> >
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whether A is "free software" and B is "our users" or vice-versa is left as
> an exercise for the reader. ;) Other plausible scenarios might involve
> soc-ctte candidates promoting "freedom of speech" versus "improving
> signal:noise".
Or "melting pot to
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
In other words, we share a common technical "culture". This is
not the case for social culture of the community; and this distinction
would tend to make a difference, in my opinion.
Well, we discussed it in private at DebConf (when I lost my
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 16:16:40 +0100, Anthony Towns
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 10:00:47AM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 02:43:24PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> > It should be relatively straight forward for Devotee to
>> >
> I hope we can lift this ban in a few days, when the involved people
> have calmed down.
This was "a few days" ago, and there are hints that the ban is problematic, so
I recommend to either lift the ban, renew the ban with a more convincing
reasoning than the high number of mails sent or downgra
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> So we have the choice to do either nothing against social problems in
> Debian or just give a soc-ctte a chance to try [...]
That's a false dilemma. For example, I suggested letting email lists
(suffering most badly ATM) promote their own admins in
12 matches
Mail list logo
