On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 11:04 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 09:55:57AM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
I'm sure that the intentions are good, but Joerg has a point about these
three DM's. Maybe it is better to replace these three DM registrations
in the DM keyring by three
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 03:42:02PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
When a new NM gains upload rights (and becomes a DD), there is a mail
on -newmaint. And it's like that for years.
But not since the beginning of adding DDs to the project, it was
introduced later on. It surely makes a lot
This is so rediculous.
--
Of course, I didn't mean that, which is why I didn't say it.
What I meant to say, I said. -- Thomas Bushnell
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 10:11:14AM +0100, Joey Schulze wrote:
This is so rediculous.
I would rather say a clever reply to a ridiculously childish GR seconds
request.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ... now what?
[EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%-
{Let:HI,Hi,Hello,hEllo,heLlo,helLo,hellO,HEllo} how are you
It - the good letter to you for the first time.
I am so successful, and I am do not know how to begin it, to write about me
directly, but to allow me to try; I live in Russia, I am very fair, the care,
trust and all qualities that to
On 11186 March 1977, Anthony Towns wrote:
I don't think any solution short of revert the GR entirely would
stop those complaints -- and in turn is why they're correlated with the
original votes.
I wonder why you aren't able to follow your own set of rules and always
ever resort to attack
On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 09:38 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Don't you have anything better to do than to try to escalate the situation?
I'll read that as a rethoric question.
What are the good reasons to remove those maintainers?
The good reasons for requesting the removal of inappropriate
Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The good reasons for requesting the removal of inappropriate additions
to the DM keyring are
Why is it better to introduce more work for the DM Keyring team than
ask a simple apology? Also, you are aware that even if multiple DD's
do second your request,
On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 10:15 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 03:42:02PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
When a new NM gains upload rights (and becomes a DD), there is a mail
on -newmaint. And it's like that for years.
But not since the beginning of adding DDs to
Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The good reasons for requesting the removal of inappropriate additions
to the DM keyring are
Why is it better to introduce more work for the DM Keyring team than
ask a simple apology?
Because the DM Keyring team
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 01:59:22PM +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
Beta-testing is good. But granting non-DD's upload rights requires
following the rules of the voted GR.
As I understand it, the people (or maybe aj individually) implementing
DM currently are taking responsiblity for those uploads
On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 14:57 +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The good reasons for requesting the removal of inappropriate additions
to the DM keyring are
Why is it better to introduce more work for the DM Keyring team than
ask a simple apology?
Granting
[Please cc me if you trim the replies to -newmaint only, I do follow
-project]
[This relates to the fact that there are currently three non-DD people
in the Debian Maintainer keyring, which is in beta-test, and some
people feel that this should be announced to -newmaint, as per the GR
text. See
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...]
I don't think any solution short of revert the GR entirely would
stop those complaints -- and in turn is why they're correlated with the
original votes.
What the hell is driving this FARCE?
[ ] Anthony Towns likes pushing people with mild
14 matches
Mail list logo
