confusion about non-free (Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008)

2008-08-03 Thread Robert Millan
[ adding debian-project ] On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 01:53:54PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 08:28:19AM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote: > > > > Earliest Eee models fully supported in Lenny > > > >Lenny will release with the atl2 ethernet driver and the non-free > >madw

Re: confusion about non-free (Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008)

2008-08-03 Thread Ben Armstrong
On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 14:17:46 +0200 Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wonder what is it that we do wrong to spread this confusion so much that it > affects even Debian developers themselves. > > What is this to blame? Would it be the FTP archive layout? Perhaps having an > unified BTS?

Re: confusion about non-free (Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008)

2008-08-03 Thread Ben Armstrong
On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 14:17:46 +0200 Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wonder what is it that we do wrong to spread this confusion so much that it > affects even Debian developers themselves. > > What is this to blame? Would it be the FTP archive layout? Perhaps having an > unified BTS?

Rejecting uploads for already existing issues (Re: debian/copyright for files not part of the binary packages?)

2008-08-03 Thread Filipus Klutiero
- If it something passed NEW last time, should that necessarily happen the next time as well? Unless the problem that was missed is serious, or its severity is higher in the newest version, yes. An oversight does not invalidate the problem, does it? Spotting the problem does not con