On Aug 05, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I disagree. The Release file in the archive is a configuration file that
> is part of the software interface to the archive. The terminology that it
> uses refers to capabilities within the archive maintenance software and
> within the softwar
Giacomo Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I recommend not attributing such judgements to the configuration files
>> of software packages.
> Sorry???
> It is more that a configuration file, and BTW the same notation it is
> also used by apt. Archive and its format are
* Robert Millan [Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:17:20 +0200]:
> Just to make it clear, please don't take it as if I were recriminating
> something to you.
Pero qué coño de vergüenza tienes tú.
How do you have the balls to say that this message:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/08/msg00038.html
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Therefore Lenny is not Debian, but a superset of it?
>>
>> This is troubling. Do you have any suggestions on how to address this?
>
> I recommend not attributing such judgements to the configuration files of
> software packages
Some good points here, but can we please continue this on
debian-project and stop cross-posting to debian-devel?
Thanks,
Ben
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Therefore Lenny is not Debian, but a superset of it?
>
> This is troubling. Do you have any suggestions on how to address this?
I recommend not attributing such judgements to the configuration files of
software packages.
I'm looking for review of http
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 21:17:20 +0200
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just to make it clear, please don't take it as if I were recriminating
> something to you. My understanding is that this problem is about general
> perception and I don't think it's your fault in any way.
I understand th
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 10:22:16PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
> >
> > > Lenny is Debian. non-free is not part of Debian. Check the
> > > Social Contract.
> >
> > I wonder what is it that we do wrong to spread this confusion so
> > much that it affects even Debian develop
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 09:17:20PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> It wasn't my intention at all to hurt someone, so I said things in the
> kindest way I could, without getting personal.
If that was the best you could do, that's troubling.
> But you have to see both sides of things. When I saw t
Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 03:18:24PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
>> : Origin: Debian
>> : Label: Debian
>> : Suite: testing
>> : Codename: lenny
>> : Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 08:39:59 UTC
>> : Architectures: alpha amd64 arm armel hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel
>> powerpc s390
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 04:01:50PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 20:36:17 +0200
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Therefore Lenny is not Debian, but a superset of it?
> >
> > This is troubling. Do you have any suggestions on how to address this?
>
> I have never u
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 09:51:42AM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
>
> Before this thread goes much further, examine the context, please.
> Read the whole thing and then tell me I am confused:
Hi Ben,
Just to make it clear, please don't take it as if I were recriminating
something to you. My unders
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 08:46:36PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 20:36:17 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> > This is troubling. Do you have any suggestions on how to address this?
>
> Stop trolling about utterly uninteresting details?
I think it's you who are trolling.
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 20:36:17 +0200
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Therefore Lenny is not Debian, but a superset of it?
>
> This is troubling. Do you have any suggestions on how to address this?
I have never understood this to be the case. Our codenames refer to
Debian releases. Both
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 20:36:17 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> This is troubling. Do you have any suggestions on how to address this?
Stop trolling about utterly uninteresting details?
HTH,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 03:18:24PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> : Origin: Debian
> : Label: Debian
> : Suite: testing
> : Codename: lenny
> : Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 08:39:59 UTC
> : Architectures: alpha amd64 arm armel hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel
> powerpc s390 sparc
> : Components: main co
Robert Millan wrote:
[ adding debian-project ]
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 01:53:54PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 08:28:19AM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
Earliest Eee models fully supported in Lenny
Lenny will release with the atl2 ethernet driver and the non-free
mad
17 matches
Mail list logo
