Re: confusion about non-free (Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008)

2008-08-05 Thread Giacomo A. Catenazzi
Russ Allbery wrote: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Russ Allbery wrote: I recommend not attributing such judgements to the configuration files of software packages. Sorry??? It is more that a configuration file, and BTW the same notation it is also used by apt. Archive and

Re: confusion about non-free (Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008)

2008-08-05 Thread Robert Millan
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 11:00:40PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: you suck. The pattern I see is that some people complain about my message being harsh by sending replies that are outright insulting. I think the reason you (and the other minority of bashers in this thread) are annoyed is because

Re: confusion about non-free (Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008)

2008-08-05 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Robert Millan [Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:20:03 +0200]: I think the reason you (and the other minority of bashers in this thread) are annoyed is because the content of my message, not because its form. You are certainly entitled to believe that if it makes your day any brighter. -- Adeodato Simó

Re: confusion about non-free (Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008)

2008-08-05 Thread Ben Armstrong
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 14:20:03 +0200 Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The pattern I see is that some people complain about my message being harsh by sending replies that are outright insulting. I think the reason you (and the other minority of bashers in this thread) are annoyed is

Re: Dealing gently with our peers (was: confusion about non-free)

2008-08-05 Thread Robert Millan
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 04:56:00PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote: On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 21:17:20 +0200 Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just to make it clear, please don't take it as if I were recriminating something to you. My understanding is that this problem is about general

Re: confusion about non-free (Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008)

2008-08-05 Thread Robert Millan
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 01:58:50PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: * Robert Millan [Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:20:03 +0200]: I think the reason you (and the other minority of bashers in this thread) are annoyed is because the content of my message, not because its form. You are certainly

Re: Dealing gently with our peers (was: confusion about non-free)

2008-08-05 Thread Ben Armstrong
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 15:08:56 +0200 Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did. It's obvious I didn't consider them well enough, but I assure you when I added 'Friendly' there (which is not part of my usual signature) I was considering the personal factors. This was a thin cloak for words

- Restposten - Bei uns finden Sie Händler Adressen und Palettenposten

2008-08-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
body Händler Adressen und Palettenposten / Restposten - Restposten - Insolvenzwaren - Retourwaren - Grosshandel - Palettenposten - Import - Export Lieferantenkontakte.de  bietet Ihnen eineoptimale Plattform um Ihre Restposten, Sonderposten, Konkursware,

Re: confusion about non-free (Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008)

2008-08-05 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Robert Millan [Tue, 05 Aug 2008 15:13:17 +0200]: I'd rather believe something else if I could. Do you have a better explanation for: some people complain about my message being harsh by sending replies that are outright insulting. Yes, that your behavior was outraging (at least it was

Re: confusion about non-free (Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008)

2008-08-05 Thread Robert Millan
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 09:27:39PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: * Robert Millan [Tue, 05 Aug 2008 15:13:17 +0200]: I'd rather believe something else if I could. Do you have a better explanation for: some people complain about my message being harsh by sending replies that are

Re: confusion about non-free (Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008)

2008-08-05 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Robert Millan [Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:17:10 +0200]: Then again, I don't see any judgement on _your_ behaviour in this mail. I just got scrutinized for using an (admittedly inappropiate) harsh tone, but apparently you don't think your own tone (which was outright insulting) deserves any kind