Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would say as Russ. Plus the fact that apparently, it currently doesn't
> work (see bug #496933).
I'm not sure what's wrong in that bug, but Kerberos authentication in
Iceweasel (3.0.1-1) is working fine for me. I'd notice immediately if it
stopped work
Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Most Debian Machines run no stable kernels, thus we would run into that
> problem. Also many machines running with static kernels. Would that be a
> problem for OpenAFS?
OpenAFS is fine with static kernels as long as dynamic modules are not
disable
Hi,
this mail is to let you know that Philipp Kern ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is now full
Stable Release Manager and that he will coordinating next point
releases.
I myself step back from the post as SRM due to [1], but will stay around
as SRM wizard for a while.
Greetings
Martin Zobel-Helas
[1] [E
Hi,
this is to let you know that we in DSA have invited Martin
Zobel-Helas to join us. Fortunately for us he accepted,
so with a bit of luck we can now go back to doing nothing and
let the rookie do all the work.
Cheers,
weasel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 11:19:45AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>On Sat, 30 Aug 2008, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
>> Having your inter-host file transfers sandboxed, such that you have to log
>> in to the host on each end in order to get the files copied to the place you
>> want them, would be a serio
On Sat Aug 30 16:43, Steve Langasek wrote:
> This is obviously an *incredibly* bad idea for anyone to do if they actually
> care about the security of the Debian systems. But we're already talking
> about hard policy changes to stop users from doing things they shouldn't do
> in the first place (=
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 06:19:32PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Well, having your browser spontaneously authenticate you to any system
> keyed in your local realm or in a realm with which you have cross-realm
> trust is something of a leak of personal information.
This may change in the future. Th
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 10:54:59PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 01:16:32AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Negotiate auth does not provide confidentiality or integrity protection
> > different to the normal use of kerberos.
> Well, ok, but you're negotiating *authenticatio
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Well, the underlying premise here is, of course, that certain routinely
> useful capabilities need to be taken out of the hands of the users because
> they won't use them responsibly[1].
> But we're alrea
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 03:01:00PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 06:48:57PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > + once we have a krb realm we could maybe also use it for other
> > > stuff like all those web services that require logins. How
> > >
Hi,
On Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 18:17:27 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> A bigger problem at the kernel level is that the kernel APIs change
> constantly and have not infrequently had various GPL-only tags added that
> force OpenAFS into annoying workarounds (it is released under the IBM
> Public License
11 matches
Mail list logo
