I was frightened by your message until I realized that it was not your
message but one of Sven… please don't forward messages that you don't
endorse (in particular when it contains wrong claims).
debian-multimedia.org is not maintained by debian, it is for patent
encumbered stuff, liable of a
David Paleino wrote:
I was frightened by your message until I realized that it was not your
message but one of Sven??? please don't forward messages that you don't
endorse (in particular when it contains wrong claims).
Ok, sorry for that :)
However, I still believe that censorship is a
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 03:10:20PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
non-free
programs
documents
firmware
art-work
games
I like it, except for the hyphen.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 09:21:42AM +0900, Charles Plessy
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:53:48 +, Clint Adams wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 09:21:42AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
How about Debtags?
You can't include/exclude things from your sources.list based on
debtags.
That could be a margin of improvement to apt-get (and aptitude, and
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:59:54 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
The listmaster said, when i asked them to lift the ban on debian-vote
for the DPL electoral campaign, arguing that the electoral campaign is
an exercice in democracy, and thus anyone should be allowed to ask the
candidates questions. To
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
I think that dilutes the message that those packages are
non-free, and reduces pressure on the authors to release the
documentation under a free license.
main
non-free
programs
documents
firmware
John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like this idea, but without mentioning FSF directly. More entities than
just the FSF use the GNU FDL for licensing.
I agree. The FSF also have no free document definition or similar
and I believe their position on documents is a convenience
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...]
My understanding of RMS's position is that he would like Debian to follow
something like the rule that the FSF has about not linking to any non-free
software from their sites, [...]
That rule is a myth. Their campaign sites like
On 11512 March 1977, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
I think that dilutes the message that those packages are
non-free, and reduces pressure on the authors to release the
documentation under a free license.
main
non-free
programs
documents
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...]
My understanding of RMS's position is that he would like Debian to
follow something like the rule that the FSF has about not linking to
any non-free software from their sites, [...]
That rule is a myth.
It most
Hi,
I have some old AMD Athlon MP processors (1400, 1500 and 1900MHz) and
PC2100 DDR RAM sticks that I do not use anymore but that work great
and could be useful to build a server or just for testing.
Is Debian interested in such hardware ? If yes, how can I send it to
your organization?
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 5:50 AM, Hervé Bouy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is Debian interested in such hardware ? If yes, how can I send it to your
organization? Am happy to pay the fees. That'll be a little contribution to
a project I like a lot and use everyday.
Please check the donations page
12 matches
Mail list logo
