["Followup-To:" header set to linux.debian.curiosa.]
Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> bike-shedding.
Thanks, interesting segue. http://www.bikeshed.com/ should be
mentioned. Long, but well worth the read.
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*)h
Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Posting a simple mail like "I can't predict why we might want to move
> > it, but it seems like a possibility we should leave open and yes,
> > ftp-master was a symbolic name, but isn't the best one now. Please use
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, MJ Ray wrote:
> Posting a simple mail like "I can't predict why we might want to move
> it, but it seems like a possibility we should leave open and yes,
> ftp-master was a symbolic name, but isn't the best one now. Please use
> the new symbolic names." a few messages back mig
Joerg Jaspert schrieb:
Hm. Get me a tarball for it to download please.
Please get it from here:
http://www.greffrath.com/debian/archive/debian-0.91beta.tar.gz
It is taken from a 2-CD-Set published by S.u.S.E. GmbH called "Linux
1.0.9, Entwicklerversionen bis 1.1.24, Unix[TM] für PCs, deutsche
Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> It's just the usual nit-picking on anybody who actually does anything to
> improve our infrastructure. [...]
It's also combined with the usual failure by many people who improve
our infrastructure to accept they wrote a confusing email (ftp-maste
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 09:17:44AM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote:
> > Your second mail (the one referenced in this thread) said:
>
> Can please someone tell me exactly for the sake of what, we are having
> this sub-thread? It just looks pointless to m
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 09:17:44AM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote:
> Your second mail (the one referenced in this thread) said:
Can please someone tell me exactly for the sake of what, we are having
this sub-thread? It just looks pointless to me ...
Pretty please, drop it, and go back helping kicking
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:15:58AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > Instead, you seem to be saying, "how could anyone be so stupid as to use
> > a non-symbolic name?" when nobody is actually being that stupid. We're
> > just using the symbolic name we were told to use the last time the names
> > we
8 matches
Mail list logo
