* Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es [090101 23:36]:
The people who do care about such an option winning have at least as
much freedom to decide as they did before the option was proposed.
They can decide whether they want to propose their own wording, or to
second the wording as already
Don Armstrong d...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
In general, I believe it is okay to second a ballot option that you
do not plan to rank first if you feel it is an important matter that
you want to see resolved. The statement I second this proposal
only
On Fri, 02 Jan 2009, MJ Ray wrote:
Sorry - I'm with Wouter Verhelst on this. Having options on the
ballot that only a small minority of DDs support can help resolve
conflicts: it lays them to rest, demonstrating they fail in the
wider DD population,
If an option can't get seconds enough to
On 31/12/08 at 12:35 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Don Armstrong dijo [Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 04:18:02PM -0800]:
(...) You should not be proposing or seconding an option that
you don't plan on ranking first.
(or high, as others have said in this thread)
I am not sure about this... Sometimes
4 matches
Mail list logo
