Ron wrote:
[...Wouter Verhelst's counts...]
> Those results are not surprising, and if anything make it clear we
> can easily get more seconds for notable issues than is currently
> required. How many more is debatable, but this isn't very good
> evidence for your assertion that 30 people is a "v
Josselin Mouette wrote: [...]
> WTF are you trying to prove? “Send me email otherwise that means I’m
> right!”
No, I'm attempting to disprove my belief because I don't see how to
prove it. http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2009/01/msg00050.html
Knowing for sure that I was wrong is as useful
Le mercredi 07 janvier 2009 à 13:05 +, MJ Ray a écrit :
> It's hard to prove that a group is ignoring something, but disproof is
> simple: please could all DDs who watch pre-proposal discussions of
> possible GRs please email mjr-possiblegr at debian.org. I'll count
> with from -f possiblegr.mb
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> MJ Ray (07/01/2009):
> > It's hard to prove that a group is ignoring something, but disproof is
> > simple: please could all DDs reading this email mjr-possiblegr at
> > debian.org. I'll count with from -f possiblegr.mbox | wc -l in a
> > week.
>
> Even for people who mi
I believe that most debian developers ignore discussions of possible
GRs like the current one, until/unless they look like reaching the
required number of seconds to trigger a vote.
It's hard to prove that a group is ignoring something, but disproof is
simple: please could all DDs who watch pre-pr
* MJ Ray [Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:04:50 +]:
> It's hard to prove that a group is ignoring something, but disproof is
> simple: please could all DDs reading this email mjr-possiblegr at
> debian.org. I'll count with from -f possiblegr.mbox | wc -l in a week.
o/` I am speechless, speechless
T
MJ Ray (07/01/2009):
> Previously, I noted that fewer than 80 people participated in even the
> hotly disputed lenny blobs GR discussion. That suggests to me that
> lots of DDs aren't participating until the vote.
>
> It's hard to prove that a group is ignoring something, but disproof is
> simpl
Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, MJ Ray said:
> > Many DDs ignore -project and even most stuff on -vote
> > unless/until it looks likely to get enough seconds, don't they?
>
> You're the one making the assertion, I think the onus is on you to prove
> it.
Previously, I noted that
8 matches
Mail list logo
