Re: ia32-libs{-tools}, multiarch, squeeze

2009-07-04 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 03 juillet 2009 à 14:59 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit : > > Do you *really* want to have more reasons? > > I would settle for one good one. :) OK, let’s try one that you can understand. Try picturing a bridge. ia32-libs-tools is trying to cross the bridge, but there is Ganneff s

Re: ia32-libs{-tools}, multiarch, squeeze

2009-07-04 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Josselin Mouette writes: > Le vendredi 03 juillet 2009 à 14:59 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow a > écrit : >> > Do you *really* want to have more reasons? >> >> I would settle for one good one. :) > > OK, let’s try one that you can understand. Try picturing a bridge. > ia32-libs-tools is trying

Re: ia32-libs{-tools}, multiarch, squeeze

2009-07-04 Thread Yannick
Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > And hey, the "good" reason was "diverting the package management tools > is unacceptable". But, no, we have to do insults instead of arguing. Alas, despite the diversion of the package management tools, I find ia32- apt-get pretty useful. For instance, I wanted to t

Re: ia32-libs{-tools}, multiarch, squeeze

2009-07-04 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Yannick writes: > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > >> And hey, the "good" reason was "diverting the package management tools >> is unacceptable". But, no, we have to do insults instead of arguing. > > Alas, despite the diversion of the package management tools, I find ia32- > apt-get pretty useful.