On Friday 31 July 2009, Steve Langasek wrote:
I don't believe the kind of coarse synchronization that's been proposed
for the releases would make Debian-Ubuntu crossgrades significantly
easier. Most of the local changes that Ubuntu has today would still
apply, and there are rebuilt binaries
Ana Guerrero wrote:
Hi,
Agnieszka Czajkowska has presented this morning at DebConf a very nice
redesign proposal off the Debian logo and the Debian website. She has been
working on this all the last year as part of her master thesis in Design.
You can take a look at her presentation
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 09:09:40PM +0200, Meike Reichle wrote:
* I really want to have a concurrent design on the *.debian.org resources
(webpages, packages, bugs, wiki, lists, ...) optimally even a slightly
different one for all the *.debian.net stuff.
Having a design that can even be taken
2009/7/29 Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org:
What do you think? :D
On the posters: I find some of them nice but would not use some of
them to advertise the project.
On the website design: I would prefer if Kalle's was implemented as it
has been 'hatching' for quite a long time already and has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30-07-2009 07:52, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 09:19:51AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
The new simplified swirl looks cleaner, and it would be nice to move
to a free-er font. The example changes to the website made it look
Luk Claes wrote:
time-based freezes
==
For the squeeze release (and future releases), we are considering a
time-based freeze, meaning that the freeze will happen at a predictable
and predetermined time with the release happening at a later time once
the release requirements are
I'm using Debian for about ten years now and I use it because Debian
is different.
While I appreciate the intention to position Debian better I am
concerned about the general direction, I am missing what I think the
most important values of Debian.
a modern look, a modern operating System
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 06:40:41AM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
wrote:
On 30-07-2009 07:52, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 09:19:51AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
The new simplified swirl looks cleaner, and it would be nice to move
to a free-er font. The example
Hello,
Werner Baumann wrote:
I'm using Debian for about ten years now and I use it because Debian
is different.
While I appreciate the intention to position Debian better I am
concerned about the general direction, I am missing what I think the
most important values of Debian.
+1
our web
On 2009-07-29, Manoj Srivastava sriva...@debian.org wrote:
So the developers are then within their rights to ignore the
short first freeze, and work to release whenever the packages are
really ready.
Uh, that's what a subset of them always did, no? Like starting transitions
during
Dne, 31. 07. 2009 12:51:04 je Werner Baumann napisal(a):
I'm using Debian for about ten years now and I use it because Debian
is different.
While I appreciate the intention to position Debian better I am
concerned about the general direction, I am missing what I think the
most important
Klistvud wrote:
In my view, Debian is far less about image and
far more about substance than any competing product (or any product
in general, for that matter).
Not that I don't agree with that, but it doesn't mean we shouldn't care about
our image at all. We can improve the distribution and
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 05:18:28PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Klistvud wrote:
In my view, Debian is far less about image and
far more about substance than any competing product (or any product
in general, for that matter).
Not that I don't agree with that, but it doesn't mean
On 2009-07-30, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
You seem to have been operating under a misconception that the *majority* of
packages in Ubuntu have been touched wrt Debian. They have not - the vast
majority of packages in Ubuntu are unmodified Debian packages, as shown by
the graphs
Ndugu mdau,
Asante kwa kutembelea HTTP://TZLIVENEWS.COM, tovuti inyokupa habari za kila
siku na kukupa uwezo wa kutangaza huduma na vitu vingine unavotaka kuuza bure.
Maboresho makubwa tuliyofanya kufuatia maombi ya wadau ni pamoja na kuongeza :
A: FORUM
-Ukitaka kununua au kuuza tuma hitaji
There seem to be two quite different models about how synchronisation
of Debian and Ubuntu LTS is intended to work. I believe it would be
very helpful to know if there is any agreement with Ubuntu about this.
The two models as I can see them from the discussion so far:
Model 1:
Debian freezes in
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:51:04PM +0200, Werner Baumann wrote:
Some examples from debian_redesign and why I'm worried:
deb_redesign-talk7.jpg shows a proposal for the Debian home page. It
starts with what is debian? and ends with all of it free. (in
bold). At the moment at
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:09:33AM -0500, gene wrote:
Hi:
I will make this short and to the point. I like Debian 5.0.1.
It does not have any wireless configuration capability
only network card recognition. Does Debian plan to incorporate
wireless USB Adapter configuration in future
18 matches
Mail list logo
