On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 04:51:22PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote [edited]:
You can take a look at her presentation at:
https://penta.debconf.org/dc9_schedule/attachments/112_debian_redesign.tar.gz
What do you think? :D
WRT the pics of the campaign, I find the ensuing discussion rather
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 06:03:41PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
This proposal received a lot of interest back then, but in the end
went nowhere. I think we should resurrect it and put into use at
least some of its parts. In particular, the part about expiration
of DD rights received only
Hello,
Good questions.
And could be added: what values Debian Project wants to be known for?
Debian products outcomes have solid values and worth. It should be
easier to communicate with truth at your side.
The suitable place for these discussions is the debian-publicity list
[0].
There are
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 07:04:18PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
wrote:
[snip]
Our current logo's font is [1]Poppl Laudatio Condensed and
Berthold sells under different types of licensing, including World
Wide licenses. There seems to be some different free alternatives
like
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 08:42:54AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 31 July 2009, Steve Langasek wrote:
I don't believe the kind of coarse synchronization that's been proposed
for the releases would make Debian-Ubuntu crossgrades significantly
easier. Most of the local changes that Ubuntu
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 11:56, Stefano Zacchiroliz...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 06:03:41PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
This proposal received a lot of interest back then, but in the end
went nowhere. I think we should resurrect it and put into use at
least some of its
Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 11:56, Stefano Zacchiroliz...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 06:03:41PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
This proposal received a lot of interest back then, but in the end
went nowhere. I think we should resurrect it and put into use at
7 matches
Mail list logo
