also sprach Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org [2009.08.07.0012 +0200]:
Sure, it has compatibility addons, but primarily it conflicts
with sysvinit and encourages vendors to provide upstart control
files for packages, instead of init.d scripts.
Why in the world does it matter whether it's a
Michael Bienia wrote:
I'm sorry about this but the amount of bugs flowing in into Ubuntu is
bigger that can be handled by the available man power, being it
developer or community members.
How does Ubuntu want to do a proper (commercial) support for their packages if
they don't even have the
Luk Claes wrote:
If the freeze date is well known in advance the question becomes moot
unless some maintainer wants to work against the freeze AFAICS. Having a
known freeze date is meant to help everyone to be able to plan better
and refrain from doing high impact changes right before the
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:38:56 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Michael Bienia wrote:
I'm sorry about this but the amount of bugs flowing in into Ubuntu is
bigger that can be handled by the available man power, being it
developer or community members.
How does Ubuntu want to do a proper
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Raphael Geissert geiss...@debian.org (05/08/2009):
Like some people said during Debconf: freezing in December doesn't
necessarily mean freezing the first day or even the first week of
December; the 31 is still December, which means there are 30 days to
decide many
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:55:36AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:38:56 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
How does Ubuntu want to do a proper (commercial) support for their packages
if
they don't even have the time/manpower to take care of their bugs? Taking
care
Beste,
Momenteel heb ik een dedicated server genomen ergens en men
zegt er dat ze geen Debian willen instaleren omdat deze niet zou werken
omwillen van de processor.
Klopt het dat Debian niet werkt onder:
Intel Atom Dual core 330
Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Luk Claes wrote:
If the freeze date is well known in advance the question becomes moot
unless some maintainer wants to work against the freeze AFAICS. Having a
known freeze date is meant to help everyone to be able to plan better
and refrain from doing high impact
Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Raphael Geissert geiss...@debian.org (05/08/2009):
Like some people said during Debconf: freezing in December doesn't
necessarily mean freezing the first day or even the first week of
December; the 31 is still December, which means there are
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 18:37, Luk Claesl...@debian.org wrote:
It was and still is not meant as a decision, but as a proposal though
the announcement said otherwise due to miscommunication from my side
which I cannot undo unfortunately.
I'm not convinced that we will be able to freeze in
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 00:30, Michael Bieniamich...@bienia.de wrote:
On 2009-08-06 16:25:47 +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
[I'm Ubuntu developer (MOTU to be more specific), so I might be biased]
I certainly won't excuse some things that are not happening, I know that
Ubuntu needs to improve
Rein Tendonsie tendon...@tendonsie.be writes:
Beste,
Momenteel heb ik een dedicated server genomen ergens en men
zegt er dat ze geen Debian willen instaleren omdat deze niet zou werken
omwillen van de processor.
Klopt het dat Debian niet werkt onder:
Intel Atom Dual core 330
12 matches
Mail list logo
