Re: Sourceless but useless: how about ignoring some irrelevant files instead of repackaging?

Steve Langasek wrote: > What is the upstream zipfile in question? > > , which seems to be the > right upstream zipfile, contains only the 6 files included in the > ttf-gfs-didot orig.tar.gz. http://www.greekfontsociety.gr/GFS_DIDOT_OT.zip (OT=OpenTy

The eve of 2009/2010 in Moroccan desert "Merzouga" !

Hello everybody For years COMFORT PLUS's Eve celebration in the desert to the delight many families and many friends. True to his spirit and his philosophy, COMFORT PLUS invites you to share this event. And to enjoy the exception A tour of 08 days, full of discovery and change of scenery ... ...

Re: Sourceless but useless: how about ignoring some irrelevant files instead of repackaging?

On Tue Sep 08 00:16:52 +0100 2009 Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 09:01:04PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > in one of the packages I mainatain, upstream left some zlib and ncurses > > static > > libraries for Win32 in the source tarball. Without the copy of the zlib and > > nc

Re: Sourceless but useless: how about ignoring some irrelevant files instead of repackaging?

Am Montag, den 07.09.2009, 16:16 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek: > > README.source - Policy only requires use of this file... > >[if] running `dpkg-source -x' on a source package doesn't produce > the >source of the package, ready for editing Requires? I thought Policy only recommends REA

Interested in Buying Text Link Advertising

Hi, This is Tom. I am interested in purchasing Text Link advertising at some specific pages of your domain : http://www.samira.co.nz/. Let me know if you are interested so that we can discuss it further. I can make a good offer to make it worth your time. Let me know! Thanks Tom