Re: The role of debian-private

2010-06-10 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 04:52:42PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: Personally I like also that debian-private carries strong personal opinion (instead of public mailing list). I don't think I'm able to interpret the above properly. If that is to mean that on -private you don't need to be

Re: The role of debian-private

2010-06-10 Thread Giacomo A. Catenazzi
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 03:46:13PM +, Clint Adams wrote: On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 04:52:42PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: I don't think traffic shoudl be keep at minimun, it is not a important list. We don't hide problem, so important things are send to d-d-a (which is the only

Re: The role of debian-private

2010-06-10 Thread Clint Adams
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 02:30:51PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: As wrote by Jonas, there is a risk of cabalization. Good discussion could also start from off-topic bad threads. I don't care if there's a cabal to discuss whether or not America, Hy-Brazil, Eurasia, and Scandinavia are

Re: The role of debian-private

2010-06-10 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 02:16:10PM +, Clint Adams wrote: On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 02:30:51PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: As wrote by Jonas, there is a risk of cabalization. Good discussion could also start from off-topic bad threads. I don't care if there's a cabal to discuss whether

Re: The role of debian-private

2010-06-10 Thread Giacomo A. Catenazzi
On 10.06.2010 16:16, Clint Adams wrote: On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 02:30:51PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: As wrote by Jonas, there is a risk of cabalization. Good discussion could also start from off-topic bad threads. I don't care if there's a cabal to discuss whether or not America,