On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:24:07 +1200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> I don't think they're required by Policy or the ftpmasters. At least the
> pkg-perl team is using Maintainer/Upstream-Contact. I don't think they
> use Name/Upstream-Name.
Just as a data point: We are using both (Upstream-)Maintainer an
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 03:24:07PM +1200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On to, 2010-08-19 at 10:31 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
my presonal point of view about fields in this DEP is that they
should be required only if they are strictly necessary, and
mentionned as optional only if there is a reasonabl
On to, 2010-08-19 at 10:31 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> my presonal point of view about fields in this DEP is that they should be
> required only if they are strictly necessary, and mentionned as optional only
> if there is a reasonable plan to parse and exploit the data.
>
> I am not aware of
Le Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 08:11:08AM +1200, Lars Wirzenius a écrit :
> On su, 2010-08-15 at 06:25 +1200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > So we have at least three suggestions on the table now:
> >
> > 1. Rename Maintainer: to Contact:
> > 2. Rename Maintainer: to Upstream-Contact: and Name: to Upstream-Na
On 08/18/2010 12:46 PM, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> [ all said above, I think ]
>> When asking the spontaneous end user to donate, we shall not expect
>> them to distinguish between the upstream work and our packaging work.
>> I hence find it problematic to collect only for us. A Debian money drop
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Jakub Narebski wrote
>
> | 19. In your opinion, which areas in Git need improvement?
> | ~
> | Please state your preference.
> | (matrix)
> |
> |Columns: don't need / a little / some / much
>
Hi Steffen,
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:10:57PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> > Ehm, yeah, and my father is the emperor of china, then.
> > As you know, in Debian we have to deal at least with:
> >
> > - uncorporative upstreams
> > - dead upstreams
> > - corporative upstreams
> >
> which would
Hi Patrick,
On 08/18/2010 11:33 AM, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 06:18:39PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
>
>> On 08/17/2010 05:24 PM, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:02:43PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
>>>
>>>
>> we should only
]] Jakub Narebski
My comments are inline,
| 19. In your opinion, which areas in Git need improvement?
| ~
| Please state your preference.
| (matrix)
|
|Columns: don't need / a little / some / much
|-
Hi Steffen,
I assume nothing in your mail is adressing me privately
so I'm quoting it in my reply to the mailing list.
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 06:18:39PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> On 08/17/2010 05:24 PM, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:02:43PM +0200, Steffen Möller w
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:29:33 +1200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> For simplicity, I will introduce a new term, "desc-escape". This refers
> to the escaping of content similar to the way Description does it in
> debian/control: each line is prefixed with a space, except empty lines
> are replaced with a
11 matches
Mail list logo
