On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:26:20AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 6:23 AM, Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi wrote:
I therefore intend to keep the fields in the spec, unless there's a wave
of opposition. I hope that this is acceptable. (The volume of DEP-5
discussion dropped to low
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 07:15:04PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
As discussed at DebConf, I'd like to renew the general idea of having
a group of individuals who are available to help groups in Debian (and
even outside, when they're communicating with Debian groups)
communicate more
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 01:17:12PM +1200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
I gave a talk[0] at Debconf10 about my experiences switching from
being a Debian developer to being an upstream developer.
As part of that talk I suggested two things:
Thanks for reporting on -project about that very nice talk
On 08/16/2010 08:30 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
In particular, developing a code of conduct/community guideline that
encourages use of a facilitator to resolve conflicts, with a goal to
avoid needing to escalate to anything beyond that. One of the issues
that came up at DebConf, and is discussed
John Goerzen jgoer...@complete.org writes:
On 08/16/2010 08:30 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
In particular, developing a code of conduct/community guideline that
encourages use of a facilitator to resolve conflicts, with a goal to
avoid needing to escalate to anything beyond that. One of the
On pe, 2010-08-20 at 14:55 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Now, I've no idea if the above would be appropriate for the upstream
front desk or not. I leave it up to you to decide whether it's worth
trying or not.
I think a debian-upstre...@lists.debian.org mailing list, open to
everyone and
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:26:20AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 6:23 AM, Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi wrote:
I therefore intend to keep the fields in the spec, unless there's a wave
of opposition. I hope that this is acceptable. (The volume of DEP-5
discussion dropped to
Lars Wirzenius l...@liw.fi writes:
* We refer to Policy 5.1 by section number, section title, and URL. I
don't think the policy version is necessary: if they make incompatible
changes, then all Debian control files will potentially break, and DEP-5
copyright files are no exception. Including
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:05:23 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
That also lets the rule with License be consistent with the rule for other
fields, by requiring two leading spaces for any literal text. It also
means that we would be using essentially the same formatting conventions
as Description
Le Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 02:30:40AM +0200, gregor herrmann a écrit :
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:05:23 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
That also lets the rule with License be consistent with the rule for other
fields, by requiring two leading spaces for any literal text. It also
means that we would
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
I have another comment on details of the DEP's syntax, about the order
of paragraphs. Policy's §5.1 does not specify that the order or
paragraphs is important, while this is a crucial information in
DEP-5. If this is not an omission in §5.1, I
11 matches
Mail list logo
