Charles Plessy writes:
> I have another comment on details of the DEP's syntax, about the order
> of paragraphs. Policy's §5.1 does not specify that the order or
> paragraphs is important, while this is a crucial information in
> DEP-5. If this is not an omission in §5.1, I recommend that this
>
Le Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 02:30:40AM +0200, gregor herrmann a écrit :
> On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:05:23 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> > That also lets the rule with License be consistent with the rule for other
> > fields, by requiring two leading spaces for any literal text. It also
> > means that w
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:05:23 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> That also lets the rule with License be consistent with the rule for other
> fields, by requiring two leading spaces for any literal text. It also
> means that we would be using essentially the same formatting conventions
> as Description
Lars Wirzenius writes:
> * We refer to Policy 5.1 by section number, section title, and URL. I
> don't think the policy version is necessary: if they make incompatible
> changes, then all Debian control files will potentially break, and DEP-5
> copyright files are no exception. Including the 5.1
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:26:20AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 6:23 AM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > I therefore intend to keep the fields in the spec, unless there's a wave
> > of opposition. I hope that this is acceptable. (The volume of DEP-5
> > discussion dropped to low en
On pe, 2010-08-20 at 14:55 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Now, I've no idea if the above would be appropriate for the upstream
> front desk or not. I leave it up to you to decide whether it's worth
> trying or not.
I think a debian-upstre...@lists.debian.org mailing list, open to
everyone and
John Goerzen writes:
> On 08/16/2010 08:30 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> In particular, developing a code of conduct/community guideline that
>> encourages use of a facilitator to resolve conflicts, with a goal to
>> avoid needing to escalate to anything beyond that. One of the issues
>> that came
On 08/16/2010 08:30 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
In particular, developing a code of conduct/community guideline that
encourages use of a facilitator to resolve conflicts, with a goal to
avoid needing to escalate to anything beyond that. One of the issues
that came up at DebConf, and is discussed in
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 01:17:12PM +1200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> I gave a talk[0] at Debconf10 about my experiences switching from
> being a Debian developer to being an upstream developer.
>
> As part of that talk I suggested two things:
Thanks for reporting on -project about that very nice tal
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 07:15:04PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> As discussed at DebConf, I'd like to renew the general idea of having
> a group of individuals who are available to help groups in Debian (and
> even outside, when they're communicating with Debian groups)
> communicate more e
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:26:20AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 6:23 AM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
I therefore intend to keep the fields in the spec, unless there's a wave
of opposition. I hope that this is acceptable. (The volume of DEP-5
discussion dropped to low enough that i
11 matches
Mail list logo
