Re: DEP5: License section

2010-12-21 Thread Ben Finney
Lars Wirzenius writes: > On ti, 2010-12-21 at 00:37 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Draft rev. 135 lists only Expat, but mentions MIT license as being > > ambiguous. Is the ambifuity solved in newer revisions? Is Expat > > preserved or replaced by MIT license? > > I don't actually see the ambi

Re: DEP5: License section

2010-12-21 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 04:54:56PM +, Lars Wirzenius a écrit : > On ti, 2010-12-21 at 14:04 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > I don't have an opinion on whether MIT license is ambiguous or not, but > > notice that it is still (in Bazaar repo as of today) not listed in the > > "Short name" se

Re: DEP5: License section

2010-12-21 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On ti, 2010-12-21 at 14:04 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:26:22AM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > >On ti, 2010-12-21 at 00:37 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >> The License shortname list includes an "other" name describes as > >> being "any other custom license". Now

Re: DEP5: License section

2010-12-21 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:26:22AM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote: On ti, 2010-12-21 at 00:37 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: The License shortname list includes an "other" name describes as being "any other custom license". Nowhere is it explicitly described that other-FOO or FOO is allowed in ad

Re: DEP5: License section

2010-12-21 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 08:42:14PM +, Lars Wirzenius a écrit : > > * yes, we (the DEP5 drivers) have communicated with Kate Stewart and the > SPDX people, though not very much yet; I don't have time to follow SPDX, > perhaps someone else would be interested in that task? Hi Lars, I have been

Re: DEP5: License section

2010-12-21 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On ti, 2010-12-21 at 09:25 +1100, Craig Small wrote: > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 09:43:53PM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > > * SPDX sometimes adds a license version, when we don't, or > > adds a ".0" to license version > > => ignore? the difference should not matter much > > => maybe suggest to

Re: DEP5: License section

2010-12-21 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On ti, 2010-12-21 at 00:37 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 09:43:53PM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > >* SPDX has BSD 3 and 4 clause licenses with placeholders > > => ignore: we'll just have many variants of BSD (called > > other-FOO or whatever) > > Related to this, t

Re: DEP5: License section

2010-12-21 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On ti, 2010-12-21 at 00:15 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > Or for one page that links to both: > http://www.perlfoundation.org/legal Thanks, picked that one. -- Blog/wiki/website hosting with ikiwiki (free for free software): http://www.branchable.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-proj