[ M-F-T to lea...@d.o for volunteering ]
I've received more details about this. There are now on board people
from Fedora, openSUSE, Ubuntu, Mageia. The plan is to have a 2-3 days
face to face meeting in Nürnberg (Germany) during the 3rd week of
January 2011. Later on discussions will be moved to
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 06:23:10PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
In my opinion, DEP5 is a work in progress, and as such discouraged
for general consumption. This is indicated my its status as
DRAFT.
I concur.
If only for this specific process then I agree it is of little value.
What
Le Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 09:55:59AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
Half-baked versions of the format, not really controlled by anyone, have been
floating around for a long while.
Dear Stefano and everybody,
In a first development phase, the wiki was used, the contents were
Hi,
for those who are just marking mails in this thread as read... ;-)
On Donnerstag, 23. Dezember 2010, Charles Plessy wrote:
Using revision 135 of the DEP from svn.debian.org is a waste of time, for
the people who would like to write a copyright file, or for the peopole who
would like to
On to, 2010-12-23 at 09:55 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
So, let's get back to the basic principles at stake. The point hardly is
Bzr vs SVN; rather it seems to be whether the working draft of a DEP
should be constantly updated and trivially accessible, for instance on
the web at the
On to, 2010-12-23 at 12:34 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
for those who are just marking mails in this thread as read... ;-)
On Donnerstag, 23. Dezember 2010, Charles Plessy wrote:
Using revision 135 of the DEP from svn.debian.org is a waste of time, for
the people who would like to
thanks - looking forward to the announcement!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:51:59 +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
Those who
already use some revision, such as pkg-perl, should stick to what they
are using now.
Agreed, and the fact that r135 in svn hasn't changed for some time
(and the development happened somewhere else) was actually helpful for
On Thursday 23 December 2010 12:51:59 Lars Wirzenius wrote:
I, personally, think it would be better to wait for the first version of
DEP5 that is marked CANDIDATE, which I intend to announce on
debian-devel-announce. Hopefully that will happen quite soon. Those who
already use some revision,
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 08:20:26PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 09:55:59AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
Half-baked versions of the format, not really controlled by anyone,
have been floating around for a long while.
Dear Stefano and everybody,
In a first
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 03:36:11PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I honestly have had a hard time following the discussion here on the
mailinglist due to not easily being able to see our whiteboard of
the progressing draft. If everyone else involved (in _developing_ the
DEP - use of it is not
11 matches
Mail list logo
