(re-adding debian-project@ to the loop so both lists have the attendees info)
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 10:33, Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:58:05AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
We're organizing a cross-distro meeting in January to discuss the
On su, 2011-01-09 at 20:42 +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
Le vendredi 7 janvier 2011 11:09:59, Dominique Dumont a écrit :
I'll update DEP5 description (aka Debian::Dpkg::Copyright model [1]) as
soon as I've stabilised the latch batch of modifications in config-model.
I've taken a stab at
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 07:37:51PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On su, 2011-01-09 at 20:42 +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
One question: if the File: * line in the first File paragraph is
missing (*), should it be added automatically ?
Nope, the Files field must always be there explicitly.
On ke, 2011-01-12 at 19:16 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Is that so?!? Then please clarify what the paranthesis below means:
Files:
Required (not in header paragraph).
It means that in the first paragraph (called header paragraph for
reasons I am not entirely sure of), the Files field
On ma, 2011-01-10 at 19:24 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
The current version of the DEP specifies that the differences with the SPDX
format will be tracked. My understanding of this, and the discussions we had
before, is that we will use the same short names than SPDX unless specified
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 08:56:57PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On ke, 2011-01-12 at 19:16 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Is that so?!? Then please clarify what the paranthesis below means:
Files:
Required (not in header paragraph).
It means that in the first paragraph (called header
Le Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 09:09:09PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius a écrit :
I think I agree with your proposal to link to SPDX. Alternatively, we
could collect the licenses as attachments to the spec, or point at the
ones on the OSI site. I'd rather avoid attaching things, but otherwise
I'm fine with
Le Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 08:56:57PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius a écrit :
the first paragraph (called header paragraph for reasons I am not entirely
sure of)
I think that there was no particular reason for calling the first paragraph
‘header’. The word that was picked was simply not the most
8 matches
Mail list logo
