Le Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 09:22:47AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 05:05:12PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
I would recommend to stick to Policy's words: if there is no upstream
sources, the field is not required.
Care to propose a patch with an actual wording?
Applied all three patches, thanks.
On to, 2011-01-13 at 09:53 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 09:09:09PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius a écrit :
I think I agree with your proposal to link to SPDX. Alternatively, we
could collect the licenses as attachments to the spec, or
On pe, 2011-01-14 at 17:05 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 08:56:16AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 03:20:37AM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
and it's ok by Policy, then I'd be happy to apply a patch someone
provides. :)
Index:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 09:53:55AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
I just realised that the SPDX site is not yet ready as their license
links point to empty pages: http://spdx.org/licenses/
I attached three patches. The first removes the FreeBSD license, the
second adds missing links to upstream
4 matches
Mail list logo