Re: DEP5: CANDIDATE and ready for use in squeeze+1

2011-01-15 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 09:22:47AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit : On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 05:05:12PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: I would recommend to stick to Policy's words: if there is no upstream sources, the field is not required. Care to propose a patch with an actual wording?

Re: DEP5: ready for CANDIDATE?

2011-01-15 Thread Lars Wirzenius
Applied all three patches, thanks. On to, 2011-01-13 at 09:53 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 09:09:09PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius a écrit : I think I agree with your proposal to link to SPDX. Alternatively, we could collect the licenses as attachments to the spec, or

Re: DEP5: CANDIDATE and ready for use in squeeze+1

2011-01-15 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On pe, 2011-01-14 at 17:05 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 08:56:16AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit : On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 03:20:37AM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: and it's ok by Policy, then I'd be happy to apply a patch someone provides. :) Index:

Re: DEP5: ready for CANDIDATE?

2011-01-15 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 09:53:55AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: I just realised that the SPDX site is not yet ready as their license links point to empty pages: http://spdx.org/licenses/ I attached three patches. The first removes the FreeBSD license, the second adds missing links to upstream