Hi Jörg,
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Compared to my last post about this meeting, we did rework our agenda a
> little bit, so it currently reads like the stuff I paste below. We
> guarantee nothing from it, but we try to at least have a few short words
> about each. Well, a report
Hi,
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> multi-arch implementation, see
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/02/msg00504.html
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:44:46PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > Compared to my last post about this meeting,
On Wed, 16, Mar, 2011 at 10:38:13PM -0700, Steve Langasek spoke thus..
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:44:46PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > Compared to my last post about this meeting, we did rework our agenda a
> > little bit, so it currently reads like the stuff I paste below. We
> > guarantee no
> I saw you included most points raised but nothing about XZ support (even
> though it's a relatively small item in term of work compared to the rest).
> I had raised it here:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/02/msg00072.html
> Did you miss it or was this a deliberate omission?
Missed.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 08:20:39AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > multi-arch implementation, see
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/02/msg00504.html
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:44:46PM +0100,
5 matches
Mail list logo