Debian page at Google+

2011-11-08 Thread Ana Guerrero
Hi! I have created a Debian Google+ page, DISCLAIMER, this page is not meant to be a Debian official one since Google+ is a non free service, but I wanted to share some things about it and have some public email in Debian lists for people wondering about the 'officiality' of this page and

Re: Debian page at Google+

2011-11-08 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
do they allow now project G+ pages? or we just need to wait until Debian would get killed there due to not being a real official name of a human being ? On Tue, 08 Nov 2011, Ana Guerrero wrote: I have created a Debian Google+ page, DISCLAIMER, this page is not meant to be a Debian official

Re: Debian page at Google+

2011-11-08 Thread Kai Wasserbäch
Dear Yaroslav, Yaroslav Halchenko schrieb am 08.11.2011 14:59: do they allow now project G+ pages? or we just need to wait until Debian would get killed there due to not being a real official name of a human being ? they do allow that now:

Re: Security guidelines for Debian people

2011-11-08 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Sonntag, den 30.10.2011, 17:33 + schrieb Lars Wirzenius: * Store your master PGP keys on at least two USB thumb drives. - use full-disk encryption on the drives - don't use them for anything else given that PGP already protects keys with passphrases, what is the benefit of

Re: Debian page at Google+

2011-11-08 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Hi! On 11/08/2011 02:30 PM, Ana Guerrero wrote: I have created a Debian Google+ page, DISCLAIMER, this page is not meant to be a Debian official one since Google+ is a non free service, but I wanted to share some things about it and have some public email in Debian lists for people

Re: Debian page at Google+

2011-11-08 Thread David Prévot
Le 08/11/2011 12:52, Bernd Zeimetz a écrit : For me it doesn't matter if G+ is non-free or not It does for our project, I would highly prefer to keep a clear statement that “there's no official Debian page”, as already done in another existing non-free social networks [0]. I think we should

private email aliases considered harmful (Re: bits from the DPL for September 2011)

2011-11-08 Thread Filipus Klutiero
Le 2011-10-09 09:48, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit : [...] - I've made the private email aliases considered harmful point [10], in a somehow unrelated thread. I ask you to watch out for interactions in Debian that could happen only through private email addresses. There are some cases

Re: Debian page at Google+

2011-11-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 02:30:59PM +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote: Since there seem to be some demand there (the page has 300 followers while writing these lines), I am planning to mirror there the stuff from identi.ca at least. Hum. Just my $.02, but I think that makes it significantly less

Re: private email aliases considered harmful (Re: bits from the DPL for September 2011)

2011-11-08 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011, Filipus Klutiero wrote: I had several problems with the BTS a few years ago. The main contact point for the BTS being a private email alias, Just as a side note, anyone who can log into a Debian machine and who actually wants to read the mail to ow...@bugs.debian.org can do

Re: Debian page at Google+

2011-11-08 Thread Fabian A. Scherschel
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote: Hum. Just my $.02, but I think that makes it significantly less useful. If I wanted to follow identi.ca, I would follow identi.ca - the value to me of G+ is that it's *not* a microblogging stream. Why isn't it? I

Re: Debian page at Google+

2011-11-08 Thread Stephen Allen
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 07:26:15PM +0100, Fabian A. Scherschel wrote: On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote: Hum. Just my $.02, but I think that makes it significantly less useful. If I wanted to follow identi.ca, I would follow identi.ca - the value