On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 1:21 AM, dE . wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I was wondering about the 2 year release cycle of Debian and it's
> adaptability on the Desktops.
If you want something with a faster release cycle, there is always
testing, which is updated four times a day.
If you want something slightly mo
On 01/01/2012 07:28 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> "dE ." writes:
>
>> http://stats.wikimedia.org/archive/squid_reports/2011-10/SquidReportOperatingSystems.htm
>
>> You might have 60% usage of Debian but for the world it's 0.02%.
>
> I've never been fond of putting too much weight on this sort of
>
Well put Russ!!!
Relative percentage is not that important as long as absolute number is
positive, which means that fun goes on and our efforts are of
benefit ;)
And depending on the audience (field of endeavor, habbits etc)
statistics might vary [e.g. 1] ;-)
[1] http://neuro.debian.net/blog/201
"dE ." writes:
> http://stats.wikimedia.org/archive/squid_reports/2011-10/SquidReportOperatingSystems.htm
> You might have 60% usage of Debian but for the world it's 0.02%.
I've never been fond of putting too much weight on this sort of
statistic.
One of the delightful things about Debian is t
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 15:16, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 01 janvier 2012 à 11:51 +0530, dE . a écrit :
>> Further, Desktop systems dont require that much of stability and
>> reliability and even security many times.
>
> This is the sentence with the highest bullshit density in you
On 01/01/12 22:05, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le dimanche 01 janvier 2012 à 16:19 +0530, dE . a écrit :
This is bullshit. Desktop systems don’t have specific release cycle
needs. Also note that the most popular desktop operating system uses a
release cycle of 3 years, not 1 year.
You might not hav
Le dimanche 01 janvier 2012 à 16:19 +0530, dE . a écrit :
> > This is bullshit. Desktop systems don’t have specific release cycle
> > needs. Also note that the most popular desktop operating system uses a
> > release cycle of 3 years, not 1 year.
>
> You might not have known, but the LTS release
On 01/01/12 21:33, Zlatan Todoric wrote:
dE, I suggest you to look into Debian CUT project. I believe thats
suits your needs if you don't like mixing branches. On the other side
- Debian is giant and complex distribution so there must be all
branches and a aprox.2 yr release cycle.
Zlatan
On 1/
On 01/01/12 20:04, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2012-01-01 at 11:51 +0530, dE . wrote:
I was wondering about the 2 year release cycle of Debian and it's
adaptability on the Desktops.
You have to admit that Debian is not used used much on the Desktops --
Really? Of the five systems in my hou
On 01/01/12 19:46, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le dimanche 01 janvier 2012 à 11:51 +0530, dE . a écrit :
I was wondering about the 2 year release cycle of Debian and it's
adaptability on the Desktops.
This is bullshit. Desktop systems don’t have specific release cycle
needs. Also note that the most
On 01/01/12 18:12, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jan 2012, dE . wrote:
I was wondering about the 2 year release cycle of Debian and it's
adaptability on the Desktops.
We cannot do 1 year, it is not enough time to get hard things done
(remember: Debian is _very large_), and still
2012/1/1 Ana Guerrero :
> On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 12:09:33PM +, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> (I post it in debian-project because I think that it has a broad impact.
>> Please move it to other list or ignore if not appropriate.)
>>
>> Just read this morning these news from
On Sun, 2012-01-01 at 11:51 +0530, dE . wrote:
> I was wondering about the 2 year release cycle of Debian and it's
> adaptability on the Desktops.
>
> You have to admit that Debian is not used used much on the Desktops --
Really? Of the five systems in my household which could count as
desktop
Le dimanche 01 janvier 2012 à 11:51 +0530, dE . a écrit :
> I was wondering about the 2 year release cycle of Debian and it's
> adaptability on the Desktops.
This is bullshit. Desktop systems don’t have specific release cycle
needs. Also note that the most popular desktop operating system uses a
Hi,
Also in Spain (Madrid):
Primeras jornadas de Software Libre y Anarquismo organizadas por la CNT de
Espana:
http://cnt.es/noticias/breve-cronica-de-las-jornadas-software-libre-y-anarquismo.html
.-.
.' '.
*
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 12:09:33PM +, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (I post it in debian-project because I think that it has a broad impact.
> Please move it to other list or ignore if not appropriate.)
>
> Just read this morning these news from a Spanish newspaper (spanish
On Sun, 01 Jan 2012, dE . wrote:
> I was wondering about the 2 year release cycle of Debian and it's
> adaptability on the Desktops.
We cannot do 1 year, it is not enough time to get hard things done
(remember: Debian is _very large_), and still freeze for enough time to
get things right.
1.5 yea
Hi,
(I post it in debian-project because I think that it has a broad impact.
Please move it to other list or ignore if not appropriate.)
Just read this morning these news from a Spanish newspaper (spanish only,
sorry). Maybe other people know about english versions, or some insider
from the
Hi.
I was wondering about the 2 year release cycle of Debian and it's
adaptability on the Desktops.
You have to admit that Debian is not used used much on the Desktops --
it appears to be more popular for servers; and the 2 year release cycle
is good for servers; increasing the release cycle
19 matches
Mail list logo
