Philip Hands wrote: [...]
> So whatever we might think about the merits of the "Open Source" term,
> it hardly seems like a step forward to render such references into
> hanging links just at the point where policy makers are starting to get
> the message.
I agree with Phil. That is why my prefe
Le lundi 13 février 2012 à 18:40 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
> Dear project members,
> as you might have heard post-FOSDEM, the Open Source Initiative (OSI)
> is opening up to an affiliate membership structure [1,2]. As I've
> already mentioned in [3], representatives of OSI have approa
On 02/17/2012 08:39 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> This looks very good on paper, but as others have mentioned, the OSI has
> taken various decisions that were in complete contradiction with the
> Debian project, especially on accepting non-free licenses as “open
> source”. While it would be nice to
Dear Jonathan,
could you share some information about the "table" -- approximate
size/shape (round or regular rectangular) and either it would have some
power sockets. I am starting to think how to organize it ;)
Thank you in advance! ;)
> We would love to have Debian at the conference and you
]] Joey Hess
> Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > Are you sure the first successful installation of Debian happened during
> > DebConf3? I remember giving a talk about Skolelinux at that conference
> > and how Skolelinux used d-i to automate the Debian installation. During
> > the talk I ran the in
Jose Luis Rivas
> Just to give context to your email, could you provide a list with the
> OSI-approved licenses that you call non-free? (Maybe a link) That way
> every one else knows which licenses are you talking about exactly.
http://people.debian.org/~mjr/legal/fsf-osi-list-diff.txt
shows the
6 matches
Mail list logo
