On Tue, March 20, 2012 09:06, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>> Shouldn't the various teams handling the group take care of managing
>> them? Do they currently fail at that?
>
> I think we can say that yes, they generally fail at asking for people to
> be removed from groups. I'm still a member of webwml
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:07:30AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> So I would advise to only make an effort to 'clean up' groups that have
> sufficiently 'dangerous' consequences attached to them.
Then logically it would follow that the ones that don't should be
gid 800 instead.
--
To UNSUBSCRI
On Wed, March 21, 2012 13:16, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:07:30AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>> So I would advise to only make an effort to 'clean up' groups that have
>> sufficiently 'dangerous' consequences attached to them.
>
> Then logically it would follow that the ones
Hi,
Stefano Zacchiroli (21/03/2012):
> Dear Developers,
> the Press Team is changing! Francesca Ciceri and Neil McGovern have
> accepted the promotion from assistants to press officers. At the same
> time, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl and Meike Reichle have decided to step
> down from the team, af
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:06:56AM +0100, Arno Töll wrote:
> Having that said, I wonder if we should discuss the possibility to
> pre-configure browser's search engines in order to provide Debian some
> income by referrals.
>
> I don't think that's a bad thing and doable without much effort but
>
regarding donations:
I am wondering -- is there significant additional
bureaucratic/infrastructural burden of adding additional
relatively easy to "engage" into lines for "micro-donations", e.g.
- automated regular (e.g. monthly) donations via paypal
(e.g. how http://accessiblecomputingfoundati
6 matches
Mail list logo
