Re: RFC - Changing current policy of debian.net entries

2012-06-22 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Martin, On Freitag, 22. Juni 2012, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > The current practice for debian.net entries is that they are directly > entered in the debian.net zone as 3rd-level records. I am seeking > comments on a proposal to alter this practice. I think your proposal is horrible for debian

Re: RFC - Changing current policy of debian.net entries

2012-06-22 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, On Fri Jun 22, 2012 at 23:23:34 +0200, Arno Töll wrote: > By the way, as a random note: The Apache Software Foundation requires > that new projects go through Incubator which follows a similar principle if we end up with a proper policy, why not do a thing like this in Debian too? Cheers, M

Re: RFC - Changing current policy of debian.net entries

2012-06-22 Thread Arno Töll
Hi, letting alone the expected discussion or its outcome as a whole: On 22.06.2012 23:01, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > * Going forward, new user-associated debian.net entries will be added as > 4th-level (or 5th-level, see last section) records in the debian.net > zone in the form of $entry.$

RFC - Changing current policy of debian.net entries

2012-06-22 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, The current practice for debian.net entries is that they are directly entered in the debian.net zone as 3rd-level records. I am seeking comments on a proposal to alter this practice. While the current practice is useful for the introduction of unofficial project services, it may involve certa

Re: Introducing http.debian.net, Debian's mirrors redirector

2012-06-22 Thread green
Arno Töll wrote at 2012-06-22 13:08 -0500: > Actually, Raphael sent it to debian-devel-announce which addresses, > well, developers. They are supposed to know the difference. > > Having that said, this list is a established mean to broadcast > debian.net services (as a random example [1]). Thanks

Re: Introducing http.debian.net, Debian's mirrors redirector

2012-06-22 Thread Arno Töll
Hi, On 22.06.2012 15:57, green wrote: > > For what it is worth, I was puzzled by the "announcement" because it seemed > to be on an "official" domain but did not seem to be announced through > "official" channels. So I agree with Raphael on this; it would be nice to > make that clear in annou

Re: Introducing http.debian.net, Debian's mirrors redirector

2012-06-22 Thread green
green wrote at 2012-06-22 08:57 -0500: > "official" channels. So I agree with Raphael on this; it would be nice to Sorry Raphael, I meant "I agree with Faidon". signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Introducing http.debian.net, Debian's mirrors redirector

2012-06-22 Thread green
Raphael Geissert wrote at 2012-06-21 20:09 -0500: > On Thursday 21 June 2012 18:19:16 Faidon Liambotis wrote: > > b) You announced this to d-d-a and your blog/planet. However, I believe > > that there are readers of those media -esp. planet- that are not that > > much involved into Debian practices

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf travel sponsorship (was: Re: Budget status - travel sponsorship)

2012-06-22 Thread Richard Darst
Hi, On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 03:35:20AM -0400, Richard Darst wrote: > [Travel sponsorship idea where Debian underwrites travel > sponsorship, allowing it to be allocated earlier, with DebConf > eventually bearing the total cost.] So, the idea seems to have support, which is good. As people point