On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 08:35:00PM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
Just to give a background as part of my NM process me and my AM
(intrigeri) started a discussion on ambiguity in DFSG #10 which
specifies example of DFSG free license as BSD, GPL and Artistic.
Heya, thanks for pointing this out
[ please refer to
https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2012/07/msg00047.html
and subsequent thread for context ]
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 06:07:17PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I'm happy to attach a first complete draft of such a policy, and I'm
looking for comment on it.
Dear all,
Hi Stefano,
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 03:37:38PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
So, sure, we could drop it. (Note that this isn't entirely trivial, as it
will require a GR with a 3:1 majority, given that the DFSG is one of our
foundation documents.)
I guess it's easy to get such 3:1 majority
On Du, 06 ian 13, 19:09:28, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 05:46:44PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
How would you organize setting up an authoritative and maintained list of
verified DFSG-free licenses ? Which formal steps would need to be completed
before an additional
4 matches
Mail list logo
