Hi,
I'm currently hacking on the maven-repo-helper package. The source code
contains copyright statements from the original author. Now when I add classes
it would be logical to add Copyright 2013 Thomas Koch.
But I don't see any sense in this. I've no interest to be the copyright
holder. I'd
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 05:23:59PM +0100, Thomas Koch wrote:
I'm currently hacking on the maven-repo-helper package. The source code
contains copyright statements from the original author. Now when I add
classes
it would be logical to add Copyright 2013 Thomas Koch.
But I don't see any
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 05:23:59PM +0100, Thomas Koch wrote:
I'm currently hacking on the maven-repo-helper package. The source code
contains copyright statements from the original author. Now when I add
classes
it
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 01:00:27PM -0500, Brian Gupta wrote:
It may also be worth reaching out to the Software Freedom Conservancy
if this turns out to be out of scope for SPI
http://sfconservancy.org/members/current/ (If I recall the SFLC helped
get them off the ground, and they were founded
Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org writes:
Thanks Brian. As a matter of fact, I discuss with Bradley (Conservancy's
Executive Director) fairly regularly and I've in the past discussed with
him the possibilities of benefiting of SF Conservancy services as Debian
Project. The problem is that
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 11:20:17AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Doesn't Debian as a whole also have nearly as many assets as all other
projects in the Software Freedom Conservancy put together?
In terms of reserves, it might be. But in terms of expenses / revenue
they're way more active than we
Hi Moray,
Moray Allan wrote:
There's been some discussion elsewhere about how young people's
experience of computers has changed over the years, and how this might
interact with our success in recruiting young people into Debian. I
would estimate that the conversation focused on 16-20
Le Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 05:23:59PM +0100, Thomas Koch a écrit :
I've no interest to be the copyright
holder. I'd much rather like to write Copyright 2013 The Debian Project.
(Actually I'm totally annoyed by anything related to copyright...)
Hi Thomas,
I share the same feeling and in some
On 10/02/2013 03:14, Paul Wise wrote:
My advice would just to put Copyright 2013 Thomas Koch and a
DFSG-free license, anything else would be more effort on your part.
I've considered using Copyright 2013 Debian Project for the licensing
of packaging that's intended to go into Debian. What
Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) jonat...@ubuntu.com writes:
On 10/02/2013 03:14, Paul Wise wrote:
My advice would just to put Copyright 2013 Thomas Koch and a
DFSG-free license, anything else would be more effort on your part.
I've considered using Copyright 2013 Debian Project for the
10 matches
Mail list logo