Re: Dealing with ITS abuse

2013-04-16 Thread Chris Knadle
On Monday, April 15, 2013 20:44:21, Don Armstrong wrote: On Sun, 14 Apr 2013, Chris Knadle wrote: On Saturday, April 13, 2013 13:34:23, Don Armstrong wrote: On Sat, 13 Apr 2013, Chris Knadle wrote: Are you saying that if someone communicates abusively in the BTS publicly, they

Geant321 and geant4 in science package

2013-04-16 Thread Christophe Hugon
Hello, I'm very interested in debian since few years, in a good part because the science packages are not bad. But I think that it should even better with the geant4 package. I don't know why, geant3 is in packages since years. Maybe I can start contributions for packaging by that (I'm

Aw: Geant321 and geant4 in science package

2013-04-16 Thread Steffen Möller
Hi Christophe, There is a steady in-and-out of activity on the CERN-associated packages. By all means, you would be more than welcome to help with contributing later versions of it all. Please skim through http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience at your leisure and follow the link to the Blend

Re: Geant321 and geant4 in science package

2013-04-16 Thread Lifeng Sun
Hi Christophe, I am the maintainer of geant321. Geant4 is not DFSG-conformed due to an anti-patent clause in the license so we cannot maintain it as a Debian official package [1]. However, Yngve Inntjore Levinsen (CC'ed) maintains an unofficial Debian package of Geant4 in CERN [2], but it's