On Monday, April 15, 2013 20:44:21, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Sun, 14 Apr 2013, Chris Knadle wrote:
On Saturday, April 13, 2013 13:34:23, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Sat, 13 Apr 2013, Chris Knadle wrote:
Are you saying that if someone communicates abusively in the BTS
publicly, they
Hello,
I'm very interested in debian since few years, in a good part because
the science packages are not bad. But I think that it should even better
with the geant4 package. I don't know why, geant3 is in packages since
years.
Maybe I can start contributions for packaging by that (I'm
Hi Christophe,
There is a steady in-and-out of activity on the CERN-associated packages. By all means, you would be more than welcome to help with contributing later versions of it all. Please skim through http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience at your leisure and follow the link to the Blend
Hi Christophe,
I am the maintainer of geant321. Geant4 is not DFSG-conformed due to
an anti-patent clause in the license so we cannot maintain it as a
Debian official package [1].
However, Yngve Inntjore Levinsen (CC'ed) maintains an unofficial
Debian package of Geant4 in CERN [2], but it's
4 matches
Mail list logo