This one time, at band camp, Joey Hess said:
> > Ultimately, we are of the opinion that the content delivery problem is a
> > solved one
>
> But apparently not one solved by free software included in Debian.
> Perhaps it's worth avoiding using it if that will help encourage the
> development of li
]] "Andrew M.A. Cater"
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 08:44:56AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > Dear Project,
> >
> > The System Administration Team (DSA) are considering moving some of the
> > static hosting that Debian currently provides from our infrastructure to
> > one or more CDNs. We have r
]] Paul Wise
> About the archive mirrors, some reworded thoughts from the DPL IRC
> channel when this came up a few days ago:
>
> [...] I think the current state of affairs is fine;
I don't believe you're one of the person who is doing the legwork in
maintaining any of the CDNs we're currently
]] Ingo Jürgensmann
> 1) Privacy concerns: Debian would deliver much more data to business
> companies than necessary. Keep in mind that personalized data is one
> of the most valuable things to data miners. Currently I choose one
> mirror site to pull my packages from. I can freely choose that m
]] Russ Allbery
> Joey Hess writes:
>
> >> Ultimately, we are of the opinion that the content delivery problem is a
> >> solved one
>
> > But apparently not one solved by free software included in Debian.
> > Perhaps it's worth avoiding using it if that will help encourage the
> > development
Joey Hess writes:
>> Ultimately, we are of the opinion that the content delivery problem is a
>> solved one
> But apparently not one solved by free software included in Debian.
> Perhaps it's worth avoiding using it if that will help encourage the
> development of libre alternatives.
CDNs aren'
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Joey Hess wrote:
> But apparently not one solved by free software included in Debian.
> Perhaps it's worth avoiding using it if that will help encourage the
> development of libre alternatives.
I guess the hardest part of the problem is logistics to get machines
a
About the archive mirrors, some reworded thoughts from the DPL IRC
channel when this came up a few days ago:
I would suggest forwarding/bouncing this mail to the
debian-mirrors list. I think the current state of affairs is fine;
some CDNs in use (cloudfront.d.n), some normal mirrors,
mirror.d.o/h
Am 13.10.2013 um 08:44 schrieb Tollef Fog Heen :
> The System Administration Team (DSA) are considering moving some of the
> static hosting that Debian currently provides from our infrastructure to
> one or more CDNs. We have received feedback indicating that a broader
> discussion is desired.
> [
Interesting idea.
If the Debian website is served to users directly from non-free
software, and so is the archive, I have to wonder what would be the
FSF's reaction to this. It seems to have some potential to burn bridges
that I'd otherwise hope would get mended.
> Ultimately, we are of the opini
This is a test mailing, to check if the address
archive@mail-archive.comO_ADDRESS%
causes bounces, tries to challenge-response or autoresponds
back to Mailinglists, or Mailinglist-Senders.
If you get an unsubscription message afterwards, one of the above
problems has been confirmed.
Fix the pr
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 08:44:56AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Dear Project,
>
> The System Administration Team (DSA) are considering moving some of the
> static hosting that Debian currently provides from our infrastructure to
> one or more CDNs. We have received feedback indicating that a br
Tollef Fog Heen:
> The System Administration Team (DSA) are considering moving some of the
> static hosting that Debian currently provides from our infrastructure to
> one or more CDNs. We have received feedback indicating that a broader
> discussion is desired.
>
> Debian has, for over a decade,
13 matches
Mail list logo
