Re: Possibly moving Debian services to a CDN

2013-10-15 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Nikolaus Rath > > - You can use an IP anonymizing service such as Tor. > > Are you suggesting to download debian packages over tor? Last time I > used it, I got about 25 kB/s of bandwidth. But even if that has changed, > I'm pretty sure the tor network isn't intended for bulk transfer of the

Re: Possibly moving Debian services to a CDN

2013-10-15 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Ingo Jürgensmann > Am 14.10.2013 um 07:29 schrieb Tollef Fog Heen : > > > - I would like us to have agreements with any donors that they're not > > allowed to use the information for anything but operational issues. We > > can't tell them not to log (because that's really hard on a technical

Help bringing bugs.debian.org / debbugs back on track (Re: bits from the DPL -- September 2013)

2013-10-15 Thread Filipus Klutiero
Hi Lucas, On 2013-10-09 01:58, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Hi, Here is my monthly report for September 2013 (+ the beginning of October). Let's also use this opportunity to call for help on two key parts of our infrastructure. [...] Call for help: debbugs developers ===

Re: Help bringing bugs.debian.org / debbugs back on track (Re: bits from the DPL -- September 2013)

2013-10-15 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > However, I am not convinced that development of bugs.debian.org should go > through Debbugs development. Unfortunately, I am not an ITS-s expert, and I > can't recommend a particular engine. There are many free ITS engines, some > of which

Re: Help bringing bugs.debian.org / debbugs back on track (Re: bits from the DPL -- September 2013)

2013-10-15 Thread Russ Allbery
Paul Wise writes: > Please don't switch bugs.debian.org away from debbugs. I don't want to > have to leave the Debian project but some misguided folks doing that > would be one of the triggers for that. None of the other bug tracking > systems have anywhere near the amount of features or usabilit