Hi,
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 11:07:05PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> On Wed Oct 16, 2013 at 21:01:08 +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 07:54:04PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > > This one time, at band camp, Simon Paillard said:
[..]
> > * Our (mirrors@d.o) is to have h
Hi,
On Wed Oct 16, 2013 at 21:01:08 +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 07:54:04PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > This one time, at band camp, Simon Paillard said:
> > > We already have a network of almost 400 packages mirrors around the world.
> > > Using http.d.n, pr
This one time, at band camp, Raphael Geissert said:
> They do require a bit more work as they can not be added to the mirrors
> master list - they are "dumb" caching proxies that can not guarantee the
> consistency of the view of the archive they provide. Here's where I disagree
> with Russ as a
Stephen Gran wrote:
> We have had one
> report that someone gets better throughput off of their existing mirror
> than they do from one of the CDNs offering their support. If we get
> better coverage for a small number of users and worse coverage for most
> of our existing users, that's clearly no
This one time, at band camp, Ian Jackson said:
> I don't see a clear explanation of what the motivation is to switch to
> a commercial CDN. Can you clarify ? That will help us understand
> what we would be giving up if we decline to make this change.
There are probably several having to do with
5 matches
Mail list logo
