On 2013-11-14 10:37:21, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] anarcat
>
>> On 2013-11-14 05:20:12, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>> > ]] anarcat
> I'm not aware of any open source 40GE PHYs for instance? Most of what
> I've seen done is around SDN, which is all nice and good, but doesn't
> actually make the PHY
On Wed, November 20, 2013 19:03, anarcat wrote
>>> And saying that "because there's proprietary firmware in your BIOS it's
>>> okay to offload all of Debian's infrastructure to a non-free CDN is
>>> okay"
>>> seems to me to be a slippery slope.
>>
>> Nobody has talked about moving all of Debian's i
I use Debian Wheezy and I installed the Choqok Twitter client version
1.3 (this one: http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/choqok), but it's not
suported by Twitter anymore, because it's still using the now-obsolete
Twitter API 1.0. Choqok 1.4 uses API 1.1, but it's available in Debian
Testing and
]] anarcat
> On 2013-11-14 10:37:21, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > Yes. If you're just anycasting an IP, you'll get pretty poor
> > performance.
>
> Can you expand on that?
BGP anycast will just get you the closest one in term of metrics. This
is probably the fewest number of cheapest hops. Th
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Eliseu Cendron Carvalho wrote:
> So, is there any chance to make Choqok 1.4 available on Debian Wheezy repos?
Please file a release-critical bug (severity serious) about this issue.
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
If the maintainer doesn't respond quickly t
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 07:43:32 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Eliseu Cendron Carvalho wrote:
> > So, is there any chance to make Choqok 1.4 available on Debian
> > Wheezy repos?
> Please file a release-critical bug (severity serious) about this issue.
I guess that's #712
6 matches
Mail list logo
