On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 07:49:37PM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
> Just out of curiosity: What's their definition of freedom anyway?
>
> Forcing the user to not use non-free software takes away their freedom,
> but probably the FSF does not get that, or they wouldn't be pushing the
> GPL so badly.
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 07:00:10PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> So, I really saw this purchase as purchasing "Debian infrastructure hosted
> at a Developer's rather than in a datacenter".
Alright, that's well-reasoned. Something I'd throw in as a possible addition
to this would be a formal agre
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 08:13:29PM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
>> > > Just out of curiosity: What's their definition of freedom anyway?
>> >
>> > You don't know what their definition of freedom is, but continue to
>> > assess their religious
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 08:13:29PM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
> > > Just out of curiosity: What's their definition of freedom anyway?
> >
> > You don't know what their definition of freedom is, but continue to
> > assess their religious views? This doesn't look very useful to me.
>
> I know ve
> > Just out of curiosity: What's their definition of freedom anyway?
>
> You don't know what their definition of freedom is, but continue to
> assess their religious views? This doesn't look very useful to me.
I know very well what their definition of freedom is. My question
challenges the vald
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 07:49:37PM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
> > Correct. Unfortunately I haven't heard much else either. Discussions
> > went on on the fsf-collab-discuss list on alioth, but the state of the
> > art is still that we're waiting for the FSF to refine current freeness
> > assessme
> Correct. Unfortunately I haven't heard much else either. Discussions
> went on on the fsf-collab-discuss list on alioth, but the state of the
> art is still that we're waiting for the FSF to refine current freeness
> assessment into more actionable items.
Just out of curiosity: What's their defi
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 12:06:43PM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> zack@ was the last person to work with the FSF on this, and I've not
> heard much else.
Correct. Unfortunately I haven't heard much else either. Discussions
went on on the fsf-collab-discuss list on alioth, but the state of the
ar
Hi Mason,
Sorry for the delayed answer.
On 16/12/13 at 22:33 -0500, Mason Loring Bliss wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2013, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > I received a few requests for hardware purchases, that I think are worth
> > discussing with the project as a whole in order to progress towards havi
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 06:45:50PM +0400, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> Any news, current status?
None that I know. I'd be really interested in working with the FSF in a
way that helps us both out a lot, and I'd really love to get an official
endorsement. I know it'll be hard, and I know it'll requi
Hello,
> I think we should either get Debian in FSF [free-distros list][1], or
> document (from our POV) why Debian is not there. I'm looking for Debian
> volunteers interested in the topic and willing to participate in a joint
> Debian / FSF team that will work toward that goal without prejudices
11 matches
Mail list logo
