Hi James,
On 08/02/14 at 13:48 +0800, James Bromberger wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 8/02/2014 11:46 AM, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> > Have you been trying to reach out to other CDN providers about supporting
> > Debian? I know of
> discussions with Amazon Cloud
On 8/02/2014 4:41 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Wasn't there an issue (that might not be CloudFront-specific) about the
> refresh times of files in dists/? I remember reading about something
> like that.
In so much as the origin HTTP server doe snot set explicit cache expiry
headers (mod_expires) on
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 07:53:56PM +0800, James Bromberger wrote:
> On 8/02/2014 4:41 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[..]
> > Sure, the hypothetical scenario which I'm worried about is:
> > - there's only one CDN provider willing to support Debian, and able to
> > meet our technical requirements
> > -
On Sat, 08 Feb 2014, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > I don't think Debian should shut down the mirror network; at least on a
> > national level. For example, right now I am configuring Debian AMIs
> > within China, and the only mirror I can access from there is
> > ftp.cn.debian.org.
>
> I don't want t
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 02:16:07PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Feb 2014, Simon Paillard wrote:
>
> > > I don't think Debian should shut down the mirror network; at least on a
> > > national level. For example, right now I am configuring Debian AMIs
> > > within China, and the only m
On Sat, 08 Feb 2014, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > In the end it matters little how we achieve these goals, but we should
> > work towards them.
>
> We disagree on this, but in my opinion, we already achieve this with http.d.n
> (except it's not DSA-sponsored and as consequence not official).
http.
Hi.
Tollef Fog Heen writes:
> ]] Lucas Nussbaum
>
>> > > 3. to provide a place to experiment with new services
>> > >+ create a "Debian cloud" with virtual machines to develop new
>> > > services
>> > > (maybe providing manually-created VMs would be enough -- I'm not
>> > > sure we
I'm quite concerned at the current line of enquiry being pursued by
the Secretary in #727708.
If I were in the Secretary's position I would refuse to entertain an
argument that the TC is impermissibly doing "detailed design work" or
has failed to allow "the usual maintainer of the relevant softwar
Ian Jackson writes:
> If someone made arguments along those lines I would advise the
> Secretary to say that these things are matters for the DPL, and that
> if a Developer feels that the DPL has overstepped the mark they should
> use a General Resolution to do so.
>
> Likewise, if the TC is over
]] Lucas Nussbaum
> Thanks a lot for this status update. I'm very much in favor of exploring
> ways to make the Debian infrastructure easier to manage, and using
> a CDN sounds like a great way to do so. It's great that things worked
> out with Fastly (any plans for a more public announcement?).
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 06:48:25PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I'm quite concerned at the current line of enquiry being pursued by
> the Secretary in #727708.
Ian,
People ask me questions. Should I just ignore them because you
think it's not a good time to answer them?
I would also like to poin
11 matches
Mail list logo
