Hi all,
This is to propose a general resolution under ยง4.1.5 of the constitution
to propose a Debian code of conduct.
This code of conduct has been drafted during debconf, and been refined
during a BoF session there and in a discussion on the debian-project
mailinglist. For more details, please
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:42:14AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
I personally would defer to the Debian press team to decide whether they
feel we should make a public statement at this time. I think we're still
in the middle of our process, which I understand that a lot of people
outside the
On 10/02/2014 17:26, Daniel Pocock wrote:
http://www.itwire.com
snip
Not really objective journalism
The byline alone is enough to deduce this. Let's not feed the trolls.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
- Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org wrote:
# Debian Code of Conduct
...
## In case of problems
Serious or persistent offenders will be temporarily or permanently
banned from communicating through Debian's systems. Complaints should
be made (in private) to the administrators of the
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 11:45 -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
It is well understood that secret laws and secret courts are not a
desirable feature for any government. I feel that the same should
hold true for our community. The procedures leading up to a ban, the
evidence collected, the criteria
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 11:59 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
[...]
## Assume good faith
Debian Contributors have many ways of reaching our common goal of a
[free](http://www.debian.org/intro/free) operating system which may
differ from your ways. Assume that other people are working towards
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Ean Schuessler wrote:
It is well understood that secret laws and secret courts are not a
desirable feature for any government. I feel that the same should hold
true for our community. The procedures leading up to a ban, the
evidence collected, the criteria the evidence
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:45:05AM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
I hope many of you will agree that while the CoC may be a necessary
feature for our community it should be governed in a transparent,
policy-driven and unbiased manner with detailed record keeping and
peer review.
I agree with
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 06:25:12PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 11:59 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
[...]
## Assume good faith
Debian Contributors have many ways of reaching our common goal of a
[free](http://www.debian.org/intro/free) operating system which may
On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 11:45:05 Ean Schuessler wrote:
- Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org wrote:
# Debian Code of Conduct
...
## In case of problems
Serious or persistent offenders will be temporarily or permanently
banned from communicating through Debian's systems.
First of all I apologize if this is not the right place to ask, but to a
newcomer all the Debian lists can be a bit confusing and I was not able to
find a more relevant list.
I am a master student at the IT University of Copenhagen and I am writing
my final thesis on contributors to Free and Open
Ean Schuessler writes (Re: GR proposal: code of conduct):
I feel we must see clearly that the CoC and its related ban punishment
effectively amounts to a nascent court system for the project.
I don't think that's the case and I don't want to see it that way.
A comprehensive ban is
- Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk wrote:
This isn't really true IMO. Someone who is banned can always send a
message privately to a sympathetic contributor, who can forward it if
it seems relevant or interesting. (I have in fact done this for a
contributor who was under some
Ean Schuessler e...@brainfood.com writes:
I am actually for the CoC. My complaint is that the GR does not require
a record keeping process. I actually agree with Steve that we should not
be concerned about publicly advertising the bans. A ban should have been
proceeded by a warning and should
On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 16:27:52 Russ Allbery wrote:
Ean Schuessler e...@brainfood.com writes:
I am actually for the CoC. My complaint is that the GR does not require
a record keeping process. I actually agree with Steve that we should not
be concerned about publicly advertising the
Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us writes:
On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 16:27:52 Russ Allbery wrote:
Ean Schuessler e...@brainfood.com writes:
I am actually for the CoC. My complaint is that the GR does not
require a record keeping process. I actually agree with Steve that we
should
On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 21:39:47 Russ Allbery wrote:
Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us writes:
On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 16:27:52 Russ Allbery wrote:
Ean Schuessler e...@brainfood.com writes:
I am actually for the CoC. My complaint is that the GR does not
require a
17 matches
Mail list logo
