The Wanderer wande...@fastmail.fm wrote:
I find that interesting.
I recall being told that, while it is technically possible to compile
and use GNOME without systemd - specifically, without libpam-systemd and
its backend infrastructure - doing so now loses
Hi,
Miles Fidelman:
Personally, I think Ian's statement is spot on. [...]
The stream of negative reactions is even
more revealing of the state to which the community has devolved.
Ah. In other words, basically, denying that a conspiracy is going on is in
itself a confirmation of the
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:01:39AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
The Wanderer wande...@fastmail.fm wrote:
I find that interesting.
I recall being told that, while it is technically possible to compile
and use GNOME without systemd - specifically, without
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi,
Miles Fidelman:
Personally, I think Ian's statement is spot on. [...]
The stream of negative reactions is even
more revealing of the state to which the community has devolved.
Ah. In other words, basically, denying that a conspiracy is going on is in
itself a
Hi,
Miles Fidelman:
arrogance, a couple of developers with an agenda and salaries behind them,
I fail to see what's so evil about getting paid for developing free
software.
And: OF COURSE they have an agenda. Getting systemd deployed as widely as
possible means less work for everbody,
Andreas Tille wrote:
I just feel the need to express my deep thanks to all your work in
Debian specifically in the endless systemd debate. While I'm
personally very neutral and just expect my computer to boot (which it
does with systemd) I really appreciate all your sensible and always
6 matches
Mail list logo