Re: Appropriate escalation (or non-escalation) re rude emails

2017-11-02 Thread Ian Jackson
Sam Hartman writes ("Re: Appropriate escalation (or non-escalation) re rude emails"): > It seems like you could act as an individual listmaster who has not > reviewed things with the rest of the team. "It's my opinion as an > individual listmaster that you are violating our code of conduct... > I

Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee

2017-11-02 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Ian" == Ian Jackson writes: Ian> Sam Hartman writes ("Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Ian> Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee"): >> I am discussing how we handle conflict because I hope we can do a >> better job of helping people feel valued even when

Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee

2017-11-02 Thread Ian Jackson
Thanks for your mail. I have trimmed vigorously the parts I agreed with :-). Sam Hartman writes ("Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee"): > That said, I actually think in some cases we need to spend more energy > rather than less. Minimizing

Re: Let's Stop Getting Torn Apart by Disagreement: Concerns about the Technical Committee

2017-11-02 Thread Diane Trout
Hi, I only just subscribed and only have read some of the discussion so this may be a bit off topic or already discussed. But I was wondering if the project has thought about explicitly encouraging mentoring in techniques for handling interpersonal conflict and helping members develop interperson