Re: RFC: endorse debian-mentors as entrance to our infrastructure projects

2019-06-10 Thread Jonas Meurer
Hi Jonathan, Jonathan Carter: > On 2019/06/09 12:55, Jonas Meurer wrote: >> My hope is that having debian-mentors as an endorsed entry point for >> diving into Debian infrastructure would lower the entry barrier >> significantly for new contributors who'd like to dive into our >> infrastructure so

Re: RFC: endorse debian-mentors as entrance to our infrastructure projects

2019-06-10 Thread Jonas Meurer
Hi again, Jonas Meurer: > So here's the idea we came up with: We could explicitely broaden the > scope of debian-mentors to include any questions regarding Debian > infrastructure software. > That basicly would mean to explicitely mention "questions on > infrastruc-ture projects" in our docs about

Re: Alternatives to the Socratic Method

2019-06-10 Thread Russ Allbery
"Chris Lamb" writes: > To elucidate, it was my understanding that the Socratic Method — at > least as the term is used today — refers to one interlocutor asking a > series of unfolding questions with the aim of leading another to reach a > particular point of view. I think the thing that most of

Re: Alternatives to the Socratic Method

2019-06-10 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Sam, > Chris> Personally, I have been over-indulgent in using such "devil's > Chris> advocate" positions in the past but after some feedback I > Chris> realised that it did not have the intellectually stimulating > Chris> quality I was hoping for […] > > I'd be really intereste

Re: Accessibility of Ledger Reports

2019-06-10 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Louis-Philippe" == Louis-Philippe Véronneau writes: Louis-Philippe> Is that more accessible? From what I understand from Louis-Philippe> your email, the beginning indentation isn't a Louis-Philippe> problem. If it is, we can script something to get Louis-Philippe> rid of it

Re: RFC: endorse debian-mentors as entrance to our infrastructure projects

2019-06-10 Thread Jonathan Carter
Hey Jonas On 2019/06/09 12:55, Jonas Meurer wrote: > So here's the idea we came up with: We could explicitely broaden the > scope of debian-mentors to include any questions regarding Debian > infrastructure software. > That basicly would mean to explicitely mention "questions on > infrastruc-ture

Re: Accessibility of Ledger Reports

2019-06-10 Thread Louis-Philippe Véronneau
On 19-06-10 10 h 44, Sam Hartman wrote: > > Hi. > An issue came up processing a debconf budget amendment. > Our community uses ledger a lot for dealing with financial issues. > > Unfortunately, I find that its reports are not very accessible at least > by default. > The issue I'm most running int

Accessibility of Ledger Reports

2019-06-10 Thread Sam Hartman
Hi. An issue came up processing a debconf budget amendment. Our community uses ledger a lot for dealing with financial issues. Unfortunately, I find that its reports are not very accessible at least by default. The issue I'm most running into is that the reports use internal indentation within a

Alternatives to the Socratic Method

2019-06-10 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Chris" == Chris Lamb writes: Chris> Personally, I have been over-indulgent in using such "devil's Chris> advocate" positions in the past, but after some feedback I Chris> realised that it did not have the intellectually stimulating Chris> quality I was hoping for and merely

Re: RFC: endorse debian-mentors as entrance to our infrastructure projects

2019-06-10 Thread Chris Lamb
Adrian Bunk wrote: > […] I'm not sure whether this particular sub-thread is salvagable but I thought I might briefly share the below in order that it might prevent parallel cases elsewhere. There exists a particular argument style where one participant in the discussion asks a collection of esse

Fwd: Weryfikacja e-mail

2019-06-10 Thread deb...@maciejpiasecki.info
This is spam? (attachment) Mattai --- Begin Message --- Drogi uCytkowniku konta debian-user-pol...@lists.debian.org, W zesz2ym miesi5cu przekroczy2eB limit miejsca na swojej skrzynce pocztowej. MoCe to powodowa7 problemy, takie jak wiadomoBci e-mail, kt�re nie s5 wysy2ane l