Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning

2022-01-15 Thread M. Zhou
Hi Paul, Thanks for the additional questions. On Sun, 2022-01-16 at 09:43 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, 2022-01-12 at 19:00 -0500, M. Zhou wrote: > > > I've had some discussions with several fellow developers on > > suggesting Debian > > to buy some GPUs to extend its infrastructures for

Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning

2022-01-15 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, 2022-01-12 at 19:00 -0500, M. Zhou wrote: > I've had some discussions with several fellow developers on suggesting Debian > to buy some GPUs to extend its infrastructures for better GPU support. Was there a plan for what to use these GPUs for? Were they needed for driver/other package

Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning

2022-01-15 Thread tomas
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 10:45:35AM +0100, Davide Prina wrote: > On 14/01/22 07:01, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: [...] > > That said, to have a workable face recognition, [...] you'll have to collect > > consent from all those face "providers". > > I think that is not so simple. The reply can be

Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning

2022-01-15 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 08:23:03PM +, Free unofficial Italian translation - FUIT wrote: > I know wikipedia. I was hoping there was a forensic court expert for the > voiceprint among you. This sounds like a wrong topic for debian-project@. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: Rethink about who we (Debian) are in rapid dev cycle of deep learning

2022-01-15 Thread Davide Prina
On 14/01/22 07:01, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 10:07:05PM +0100, Davide Prina wrote: On 13/01/22 01:00, M. Zhou wrote: Cool and useful stuff keeps emerging -- e.g., Facial Authentication for Linux https://github.com/boltgolt/howdy note that EU (European Union)