> "Ansgar" == Ansgar writes:
Ansgar> I would very much prefer explicit sexual content over Nazi
Ansgar> symbols. So let me make a suggestion:
As would I.
If anyone wants to work on the challenges of adult content feel free to
reach out and I'd be happy to spend some of my time on
On 2022-11-23 at 16:16, Ansgar wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-11-23 at 12:34 -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> It is not necessary, but as I discussed in my long message about
>> removing software from Debian, removing creative content from
>> Debian has a chilling effect.
>
> I would very much prefer
On Wed, 2022-11-23 at 12:34 -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> It is not necessary, but as I discussed in my long message about
> removing software from Debian, removing creative content from Debian
> has a chilling effect.
I would very much prefer explicit sexual content over Nazi symbols. So
let me
> "Andrew" == Andrew M A Cater writes:
Andrew> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 03:05:29PM -0600, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
>> [I'm using the pseudonymous respondent's message to reply to
>> Mr. Cater as well. Mind the angle brackets for quotation
>> context.]
>>
>> At
n> "G" == G Branden Robinson writes:
G> Neither you nor he, therefore, is well placed to present a
G> (presumptively neutral) summary of the discussion. (Neither am
G> I.)
Branden, I'd like to push back on the idea that we want a summary from
someone neutral.
If we have that
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 03:05:29PM -0600, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> [I'm using the pseudonymous respondent's message to reply to Mr. Cater
> as well. Mind the angle brackets for quotation context.]
>
> At 2022-11-23T14:14:38-0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> > On 2022-11-23 at 13:06, Andrew M.A.
I call out one area where I think additional discussion is valuable; see
after the underscores.
I'd like to thank Andrew for posting his summary of the discussion.
As I have said over the years, I think such summaries are a critical
part of driving discussions forward.
I didn't ever get a chance
[I'm using the pseudonymous respondent's message to reply to Mr. Cater
as well. Mind the angle brackets for quotation context.]
At 2022-11-23T14:14:38-0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2022-11-23 at 13:06, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > Thank you for your considered opinions thus far. We have various
On Wednesday, 23 November 2022 19:06:33 CET Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> If Debian doesn't distribute fortune files but instead provides the means
> for users to make/download their own choice, nothing is lost. Debian is
> not responsible for maintaining any file content, whether questionable
> or
Hi,
The next point release for "bullseye" (11.6) is scheduled for Saturday,
December 17th. Processing of new uploads into bullseye-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 02:14:38PM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2022-11-23 at 13:06, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>
> > A serious suggestion: it is not necessary for Debian to package
> > fortune files at all.
>
> I find this suggestion demotivating and discouraging.
>
> > The single collection
> "Andrew" == Andrew M A Cater writes:
Andrew> All, Thank you for your considered opinions thus far. We
Andrew> have various developers who have written defending free
Andrew> speech: we've had others who have expressed various
Andrew> reservations with one aspect or other
On 2022-11-23 at 13:06, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> All,
>
> Thank you for your considered opinions thus far. We have various
> developers who have written defending free speech: we've had others
> who have expressed various reservations with one aspect or other of
> the status quo.
>
> There's
All,
Thank you for your considered opinions thus far. We have various developers
who have written defending free speech: we've had others who have expressed
various reservations with one aspect or other of the status quo.
There's been a grudging consensus that this is *hard*. It's very hard
14 matches
Mail list logo
