* R. Armiento [Fri, 03 Jun 2005 18:02:54 +0200]:
> I just want to bring bug #311683 to "public awareness" and
> discussion. Since it is a bit of a "sociopolitcal" and policy
> issue, I suspect there may be people out there who feel
> strongly about this one way or the other, and with
> the upcomin
* Adeodato Simó [Thu, 27 Jan 2005 06:10:39 +0100]:
> So I have a question: what is the _practical_ result of License LB in
> (b) above, that D can't use A's LB-licensed programs any more, unless
^
uhm, that's probably wrong, then? (After
[I'm trying to follow the discussion in hopes of better understanding
the issue in order to form an opinion about it. Please excuse me if I
need big amounts of cluebat with this...]
* OSS [Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:27:44 -0700]:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> >Matthew Garrett's subsequent message pinpoints
3 matches
Mail list logo
