Dear all,
On 2023-11-23 07:11, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Our hosting agreement with AQL has ended. As a result we need to unrack
> the servers that were hosted there. We are working on relocating them or
> setting up new servers elsewhere.
>
> The list of
Dear all,
On 2023-12-27 22:27, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> As part of making riscv64 as an official architecture, the riscv64 porterbox
> will be reinstalled. For this reason, it will be unavailable for a couple of
> days. It will then come back as ricci.debian.org.
The
Hi,
On 2022-10-22 13:16, David Bremner wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno writes:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > We lost access to the Power9 machine hosted at Unicamp, which was
> > hosting the ppc64el porterbox called plummer.d.o. A new porterbox called
> > platti
sted on the "Debian Ports" [1]
service. The Debian Ports admins are not related to this group of
porters.
Regards,
Aurelien
[1] https://www.ports.debian.org/
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 2016-08-24 23:18, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> The mipsel and mips64el porterbox, etler.d.o, will be shutdown and
> decommissioned in about 12h. It will be replaced by a faster Octeon III
> based machine, whose name hasn't been chosen yet. It will be installed
&g
On 2016-02-13 19:56, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>
> On Sun, 14 Feb 2016, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > https://www.lsc-group.phys.uwm.edu/lscdatagrid/doc/reference-platform.html
>
> > > The Ganglia graph (top right corner of the page) appears to be generated
>
or any other system have helped at some moment. Just looking at
one random website from one small subpart of the whole project to
conclude about the Debian implication in the whole project just doesn't
make sense. It is just like deducing that pelican helps the Debian
project because it is use
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-4.9&arch=s390x&ver=4.9.3-6&stamp=1447956518
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-4.9&arch=s390x&ver=4.9.3-7&stamp=1447972159
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-5&arch=s390x&ver=5.2.1-
ebian-hppa/2011/04/msg00021.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-hppa/2011/04/msg00026.html
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ain/w/wordplay/wordplay_7.22-17_alpha.deb
debian/pool/main/w/wp2x/wp2x_2.5-mhi-9_alpha.deb
[3] http://packages.debian.org/debian-ports-archive-keyring
[4] http://www.debian-ports.org/mirrors
[5] http://www.debian-ports.org/archive
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 11:54:56PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As some of you might already be aware, debian-ports.org is moving to a
> new machine, which should solve our disk space issues and secure the
> hosting for the future. This machine is now hosted b
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 02:50:03PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 02:27:42PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > If porters would like psuedopackages for their architecture to
> > > track requests, t
est for that. In most cases fixing a porting
issue is not the responsibility of the maintainer nor the porter, but
both together. With pseudo-packages it will end-up as bugs reassigned
to the pseudo-packages (to the porters), with the maintainers being
satisfied of having one bug less to car
it is done for example for RC bugs.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list
Does this mean that Ubuntu will finally put some manpower on helping the
(E)GLIBC development, both on the packaging side and on fixing/reporting
upstream bugs? Currently Debian is doing most of the work.
Aurelien
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2009/08/msg00101.html
--
Aurelien Jarno
re-use patches
like that posted by other distributions. Also you now also have the
option to re-submit it to EGLIBC. Sometimes the patches are rewritten
and the attributions lost in the meanwhile, but as the lists are public,
this does not prevent other persons following them to recognize your
work.
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 09:28:18PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 09:15:03PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Bernd Zeimetz (03/08/2009):
> > > Ack ack ack. I even have the impression that the Canonical employees
> > > want to ensure that Debian
sly false, see how (e)glibc maintainers are pushed by Ubuntu
> people to get the next release ready, ignoring their own bugs?
>
And for the ones they can't ignore, forwarding them directly in the
Debian BTS, even if they correspond to a version that has never been
uploaded to t
an't
we add another exception that the first freeze is not December, even if
it means the other implied exception is that we are in freeze for
Debconf *10* (and not for every Debconf)?
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://ww
swer to that, but
I really doubt it is enough.
Cheers,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Didier Raboud a écrit :
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> I really like the idea of:
>> - activity => you keep your membership
>> - inactivity => you lose your membership
>>
>> Maybe we could find another way to define activity, like (upload || vote
>> || svn
ne side I understand that you don't want make voting mandatory, but
I really like the idea of:
- activity => you keep your membership
- inactivity => you lose your membership
Maybe we could find another way to define activity, like (upload || vote
|| svn commit || ...), which retr
eally like your proposal, it is simple and at the same time it is
able to solve lot of problems: NM, MIA, DAM SPOF...
There is still some minor changes I would like to see (for example I
really think that a new member should still agree with DMUP/SC/DFSG),
but I consider it a really good basi
before allowing DM uploads should be enough. That's actually
> | what I had in mind when I proposed something like DM 2 years ago - which
> | was fine with you back then.
>
How long has it been discussed? I am really surprised that your comments
still fully apply to the current &
gards,
Aurelien
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/07/msg7.html
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-p
s of
> the whole issue.
>
> We plan to integrate DM more closely into the NM process/system
Could you please define "We".
> while keeping the spirit of easing entry into Debian for newcomers.
> At the same time we add a separate track for less-technical
> contributor
dfasdf.debian.net to regenerate
>> their pages.
>
> We have *FULL* tracking of all debian.net. records, available in a public
> (if non-standard, as there is no standard for these things) way.
>
> host -t TXT asdfasdf.debian.net.
> asdfasdf.debian.net descriptive text
oks like by accident.
This machine has been setup, it is called albeniz.debian.org, that's why
the bug has been closed.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
> Wookey a écrit :
>> On 2007-05-08 12:05 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> The ARM port is getting bad [1], the percentage of packages built
>>> staying a bit more than 90% for 2 weeks. Also this is confirmed
Wookey a écrit :
> On 2007-05-08 12:05 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The ARM port is getting bad [1], the percentage of packages built
>> staying a bit more than 90% for 2 weeks. Also this is confirmed by a
>> message on #debian-arm this morning:
te/2007/platforms/sho
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Fedora users,
Mandriva users, Gentoo users, Slackware users, BLFS users, and probably
others.
Given the number of distribution involved, I wonder who is unable to
cooperate.
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | E
Package: project
Severity: serious
The Debian project lacks an alpha developer-available machine for about
8 months. This makes some bugs impossible to fix.
The severity is set to serious because alpha is a release architecture
for Etch, but without a developer-available machine it is not sure it
oblem now concerns glibc 2.5 (or later) which will be the glibc
for Lenny. I think the easiest solution is simply to *not* consider
alpha as a release architecture for Lenny from the glibc point of view,
and ignore bugs (but accept patches). After all this architecture fails
one release criterion.
--
dated.
Cheers,
Aurelien (with its GNU/kFreeBSD hat on)
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aure
arly in the
development of this architecture (ie two or three weeks after the
toolchain has been ported), and I think I have learned more from that
than if it has been an official and fully mature architecture.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer
uot; is broken for weeks.
- "tofee" is loosing packages for weeks.
- Some build daemons do not have enough resources to build big packages.
Nobody adds those packages to weak_no_auto_build or weak_no_auto_build
on those build daemons.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | G
oads. I know at least two
packages with RC bugs which won't move to testing because one of the ARM
build daemon have (recurrent) problems (and it's not netwinder nor
elara). And this time I won't be able to build them by hand.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | G
Anthony Towns a écrit :
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 09:06:01PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> It is known among debian developers that the Debian System
>> Administration Team (aka DSA or [EMAIL PROTECTED]) is not
>> really responsive.
>
> So apparently this complaint
requeued, build daemons
fuckage...
> are not just dep-waits) and tackle those, IMHO (I don't know whether the
> arm port has any pending issues to that end right now).
and send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and wait forever...
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG:
ts.debian.org/debian-arm/2006/12/msg00053.html
[5] http://www.debian.org/devel/constitution
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-peop
Hi!
Thanks a lot for this mail. It clearly explains what I and others feel
about the Dunc-Tanc "experiment". I haven't signed it, but please
consider this mail as a signature.
Bye,
Aurelien Jarno, Debian Developer
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 07:46:00PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
&
only
allow pubkey ssh authentication?
Definitely a good idea.
We already trust users to maintain their GPG key securely, so
adding the requirement they do the same with an SSH keypair isn't
anything more difficult.
Like having both public and private SSH keys on gluck.d.o?
--
.
the same days. I should know that before the
end of the week, so if you are interested, please tell me.
Bye,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAI
gain my confidence, here is what you could do:
- Do everything to make sure that the "Vancouver proposal" doesn't
become real. In the future, I hope it will be still possible to call
Debian "the Universal OS".
- Stop the "Project Scud", the cabal is alrea
an nothing.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
46 matches
Mail list logo
