Hi,
I have a bug report against UMLet [1] which states that printing to a
shared SMB printer using CUPS with authentication-requirement does not
work. I had the reporter test printing with freemind too, where he has
the same problem.
A superficial web search does not reveal a solution for this
Hello,
It calls our distro reliable and secure and states that they add
maturity and corporate readiness. Then they go on to state that
Debian is
- reliable
- secure
- upgradeable
- integrateable
- preconfigured
- remotely administratable
and that they add support and
Hello,
And Debian has lacked security support for new software for a
long time (I believe testing is supported now).
What I meant to say here is, that testing with the latest relatively
stable software in it, had no security support in the past.
and since their ad is entitled Debian of full
Hello
The report you can see was a ordinary e-mail sent to the maintainer of
Aptitude. He saw it as a Dpkg thing and asked me if he could send it to the
public dpkg list. I said O.K. Now you can think I have to blame myself but I
could never thought about that he would include my
[Robert Werner is complaining about Debian being unusable and
old-fashioned. I point him to the debian-user-german list.]
Dies is eine englischsprachige Liste. Bitte senden Sie deutsche Beiträge
an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Benjamin Mesing
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 13:06 +0200
Hello
like your studies (beeing in a computer science PhD/MSC helps),
Well this might be interesting for the Debian project, but applicants
might not want this to become public knowledge. Please do not assume,
that this is for any particular reason, but merely for keeping ones
privacy.
Debian
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 02:09 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 06:59:44PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
For 2.2, I'd recommend that NM's maintain a page about them on
wiki.d.org (my current applicant did that, and I found that rather
useful). In a glance you can see
Hello
I would strongly suggest, allowing to restrict access to such a site
to DDs. This is because not everyone feels comfortable having
personal information (like your specific view on free software)
world-accessable. Debian developers need to know, since you are about
to become part
Hello,
my comments as someone planning to enter NM during the next couple of
month follow.
Overall I find your analysis enlightening. I agree with those points I
do not discuss here.
1.2.1 Add more people
[Marc argues that this is not a long solution]
I disagree here up to a certain point. I
Unless you are not planning to have long term second class
developers
Make this: Unless you are planning to have long term second class
developers
--
Please do not send any email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- all email not
originating from the mailing list will be deleted. Use the reply to
address
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 15:07 -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 4/11/06, Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless you are not planning to have long term second class
developers
Make this: Unless you are planning to have long term second class
developers
No, no, no. Give someone
11 matches
Mail list logo
