Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free

2000-06-13 Thread Carsten Leonhardt
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marek Habersack) writes: > > And don't you think that it contradicts the, so many times quoted, > > point 4 of the Social Contract that mentiones *users* as our > > *primary* priority (the word "users" is put before "free software" >

Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free

2000-06-10 Thread Carsten Leonhardt
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marek Habersack) writes: > > ** On Jun 10, John Goerzen scribbled: > > > Note: the distribution does not contain non-free now. > > Yah, and that makes your GR completely pointless. > > The FTP site does. Why is it so hard for people

Re: An ammendment (Re: Formal CFV: General Resolution to Abolish Non-Free)

2000-06-10 Thread Carsten Leonhardt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I wish to propose an ammendment to the proposed resolution as follows. > > The text of the resolution should be replaced with a call for the > developers to resolve that: > > -