Re: Stefano Zacchiroli 2012-06-25 20120625165835.gb20...@upsilon.cc
Making this even clearer with a *.incubator.debian.org namespace might
be a good idea. (Modulo some transition time, doing so will eventually
replace *.debian.net, if I got that right.)
- I've already discussed in a
Re: Lars Wirzenius 2010-09-15 1284541176.2573.77.ca...@havelock
This reminds me: it would be good to improve not just the quality of our
packages, but our developers.
Just a quick comment here: DM has improved the quality of people
passing NM *a lot*. Historically, we (FD, DAM) have seen lots
Re: gregor herrmann 2010-07-05 20100705174124.gj4...@belanna.comodo.priv.at
_If_ the membership stuff is changed; is anybody working on this
issue currently?
It's on top of the NM TODO list, together with the website rewrite.
(Which is a precondition.)
Christoph
--
c...@df7cb.de |
Re: Enrico Zini 2010-06-15 20100615102602.ga11...@enricozini.org
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:45:32PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Now I would like to stop dealing with those requests and thus I would like
a team of people to replace me.
Do you have a way to know what percentage of
Re: Roland Mas 2010-06-15 87d3vs79yp@mirexpress.internal.placard.fr.eu.org
And to drive the idea further, what about a public-maint group that
everyone with an alioth account can commit to?
I'm not sure I want that. Everyone with an alioth account (which you
can get with no vetting
Re: Enrico Zini 2010-06-09 20100609140853.ga3...@enricozini.org
So, some people are advocating in favour of a private mailing list for
DD chatter. The fact that that idea is being very vocally pushed by no
less than two people prompts me to double check some fundamental facts
about the Debian
Re: Josip Rodin 2008-03-22 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been composing a proposal regarding how Debian's infrastructure teams
operate. It would be a good idea if the interested members of teams take
a look at it and contribute their insight.
The last version of the text is at:
Debian New Maintainer Front-Desk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://nm.debian.org/Christoph Berg
November 25, 2007 http://www.debian.org/devel/join
of,
Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:59:13 +0100
Source: debian-maintainers
Binary: debian-maintainers
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Maintainer Keyring Team
Re: Joerg Jaspert 2007-08-07 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Im not sure why this isnt yet integrated into Debian, afaik Myon tried
to do that already with Mako, but I dont know why it didnt
happen. CC-ing both, hoping we get that into official planet soon. :)
I never got around to talk to Mako about that -
Re: Anthony Towns 2006-10-27 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Anthony,
thank you very much for the in-depth reply, that's what I had hoped
for when signing in to the statement.
I'd encourage people both pro- and anti- Dunc-Tank to consider the advice
of http://www.donotfeedtheenergybeast.com/ and whether
Re: Reinhard Tartler 2006-10-11 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From my observations, is seems that the only persons who can judge about
these questions are the current DAMs (James and Joerg), and perhaps the
DPL, since only they can approve new members of FD and DAM. (Given that
I understand the current
Re: Raphael Hertzog 2006-09-06 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alioth's web server was unavailable for most of the 5th of september. It was
simply stopped because we discovered that some script kiddies were running an
IRC proxy. After thorough investigation, we discovered that they exploited a
pmwiki
Re: Pablo Rodrÿedguez Alonso 2006-05-17 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My name is Pablo Rodríguez and i´m a debian user in my
intel pc. I reacently buy an apple minimac intel. I
would like to know if there´s a debian version that i
could install in my mac intel. If there´s not, I would
like to know if
Re: cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) 2006-05-16 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
what's the rationale for needing a 2nd package?
e.g. I currently maintain 1 small simple sponsered package, I also have
contributed for several years as a translator.
If we're introducing a new stage with upload rights for
Re: Jeremiah Foster 2006-05-16 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Limiting voting rights seems a step in the wrong direction. Doesn't
debian want more enfranchisement rather that less?
We don't limit anything here, the prospective DMs can't vote in the
current system either. We can of course discuss on whether
Re: Hubert Chan 2006-05-16 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6. can use his gpg key to upload this package [2]
- no account/@d.o address yet
- every upload which would go to NEW needs a sponsor [3,4]
I think it may be good to allow the sponsor to decide when the DM is
allowed to make uploads
Hi,
these are my thoughts on how the NM process could look like in the
future. The proposal has been inspired by Anthony Town's blog posting
at [1], by my own experience in NM and being an AM, and finally by
discussions with Marc Brockschmidt.
[1]
Re: Paul Johnson 2006-05-14 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why does it necessarily have to be IRC? Jabber fixes a lot of IRC's
shortcomings, without bringing along all the political drama and baggage
OFTC, Freenode, and every other IRC network in existence. Switching to
another IRC network just sets
Re: Michael Banck 2006-04-12 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:25:28AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Could you report such sponsors, so we may take their
sponsorship privileges away?
There's no technical way to do this (yet), as far as I can see.
Iirc one developer
interested
in the process, and hence more active, than those that only reply to
some d-d-a posting.
I don't know what happen on nm-committee but for example I believe that
general discussion between AM on how to improve the system can happen on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] instead. (And Christoph Berg told
Re: Manoj Srivastava 2006-04-06 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
quote who=Steve Langasek date=Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 02:30:46AM
-0700
And maybe I'm too heavily steeped in Debian culture to take an
objective view, but I don't see any reason why translators,
documentation writers, artists, et al. should
Dear developers,
I know that having codified expulsion procedures is tempting to use
them, and I do think that they are a good thing to have. But please
consider one thing when you think about invoking them: [1]
Please use debian-private. [3]
The reason is simply that expulsion is not a
Re: Lars Wirzenius 2006-03-16 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I disagree. Posting things to -private does not really keep them secret
or confidential, but it does generate a lot of rumors. Rumors are
usually worse than the real thing. Therefore, in my honest opinion, it's
better to keep things in the open,
Re: Ulrich Müller in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ein paar einfache Fragen an euch:
debian-user-german@lists.debian.org ist die richtige Liste für solche
Fragen.
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The question is : are Security updates created for the 3.0 release ?
Yes.
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Robert Tolu in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My name is Robert Tolu and I currently lead a project
known as Debian Pure (www.debianpure.com).
[from the website]
| However, installing a Debian desktop is not new-user friendly.
Have you considered joining the debian-installer team?
Christoph
--
[EMAIL
Re: Rapid Sun in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Last month, i have attended Debian Mini Conference in Beijing. The
project manager, Mr. Martin, mentioned about helping Debian.
Cambodia is new to Open Source. I am very interesting in this and some
of my students want to be debian developer.
There are
Re: Lars Jørgensen in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry this was the wrong place to paste this i did send this mail to the
wrong adress im so sorry!
I did copy the wrong mail adress on your officiel site im am so sorry!.
Again i am really sorry i hope you would take my sorry
- SORRY! :(
:
http://www.debian.org/News/2003/20031121a
The fact that the Debian web pages are not as up-to-date as usual is due
to a recent breakin in project machines:
http://www.debian.org/News/2003/20031121
Christoph
--
Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.df7cb.de/
Wohnheim D, 2405
at the Debian web site at
http://www.debian.org/distrib/
Christoph
--
Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.df7cb.de
Wohnheim D, 2405, Universität des Saarlandes, 0681/9657944
pgpKihtkehlHA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
31 matches
Mail list logo
