Hi,
this whole discussion touches some deep points that I'd like to
comment on.
Basically I can make out two attitudes, or views of the project,
resulting in arguments over more minor points. I'll call these groups
the "open" and "closed" positions. I know this is a _large_
oversimplification
On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Gerhard Poul wrote:
I don't think that there is something like an 'official' partner of the FSF.
AFAIK Debian evolved out of a GNU Project.
btw: RMS != rms :-)
Well - Debian is the preferred GNU/Linux distribution of the FSF - by rms'
words. As can be seen from the
2 matches
Mail list logo
