At 2024-05-02T16:31:39-0600, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> Generative AI tools **produce** derivatives of other people's
>> copyrighted works.
>
>> That said, we already have the necessary policies in place:
>
> Russ pointed out this is a fairly complicated claim.
>
> It is absolutely true that
Hi there,
I'd address you with an honorific and your surname, but I am too
ignorant to infer correct ones from the name shown in your email. I'm
sorry about that.
At 2024-02-06T19:03:41+0900, Jiyoung Wee wrote:
> I have a request about Debian License Policy.
>
> This is our case.
> 1. For the
At 2023-08-23T15:40:06+0100, Adam Sampson wrote:
> "Andrew M.A. Cater" writes:
> > where are we going to get our fortunes from - where's the canonical
> > source now that FreeBSD has gone?
>
> There is Shlomi Fish's version:
> https://github.com/shlomif/fortune-mod/
I've been mulling over
[self-follow-up]
It occurred to me that I need to correct and clarify a couple of points.
I'll try to be brief about it, at least relative to my own mean email
length, if not the project's.
At 2023-08-21T16:51:42-0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
[...]
> When we went around the bl
[It took me so long to write this that responses from Russ and Steve L.
have since come through. I find myself in concord with both messages.]
At 2023-08-21T19:02:27+, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 05:32:22PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> > On 2023-08-21 20:16:22 +0300
arbage workers.
At 2023-08-18T21:09:11+, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> As the person who raised this on debian-project in November 2022 - see
> the archives for debian-project for November/December 2022
[...]
> There was unfortunately no consensus on removal on debian-project and
At 2022-12-18T16:07:28-0600, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> Did you see the part where I ITA-ed fortune-mod?
>
> No one has yet responded my invitation to be a technical consultant to
> save my geriatric packaging skills from embarrassment. This may be
> because people are
At 2022-12-17T19:02:11-, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> I have been around long enough to remember when in 2004 a very
> prominent developer of Chinese origins
...but in Australia at the time and, I have heard, residing there still.
> hurriedly left the project when the d-i (?) team refused to
[I'm using the pseudonymous respondent's message to reply to Mr. Cater
as well. Mind the angle brackets for quotation context.]
At 2022-11-23T14:14:38-0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2022-11-23 at 13:06, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > Thank you for your considered opinions thus far. We have various
At 2022-11-21T07:58:29-0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "G" == G Branden Robinson writes:
>
> G> By your metric, so is the Hebrew Bible. For all the slaughter,
> G> xenophobia, and ethno-religious supremacism in it, there's some
> G> good
Hi Jonathan,
Thank you for stepping forward to present yourself for potential
criticism in a discussion forum. Unfortunately that is the only
laudable aspect I can locate in your message.
At 2022-11-21T15:39:24+, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 12:07:53AM +0100, Michael
At 2022-11-21T03:10:27+0100, Roberto A. Foglietta wrote:
> Please, keep in mind that in Germany the nazi propaganda is out-of-law
> but in some other countires out-of-law is the use of the name of the
> profet (whoever he is). So, law compliance might not be as easy as you
> pretend to be unless
At 2022-11-20T15:34:51-0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 12:28:59PM -0600, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > At 2022-11-20T11:41:56+0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> > > I'm personally fine to defend the "less neutral" position we take by
>
At 2022-11-20T23:55:52+, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >As it was an NMU, this should be easily rectified.
> >Don't let cancel culture win.
>
> Are you volunteering to pick up the package and review its contents,
> removing the worst stuff that is clearly *not* fit for us to publish?
You adopt the
At 2022-11-20T11:41:56+0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> I'm personally fine to defend the "less neutral" position we take by
> dropping fortunes-off which is total garbage.
"Total garbage." Have you _read_ it?
Running "fortune -o" myself a few times, I get the following results.
These are in
At 2022-11-19T23:07:50+0100, Dominik George wrote:
> > Right, and has has been discussed before (more times than can be
> > counted, most likely) having some sort of content does not imply that
> > the ideology itself is promoted. The presence of the texts of the
> > Torah, the Christian Bible,
At 2022-09-16T19:12:40+0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 08:47:19AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> > That's easy to explain why your bugs are fixed quickly. You are a
> > DD, so your bugs are important. I am not a DD so my bugs are not as
> > important to the maintainers who
At 2019-12-13T11:36:00-0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> This offended word keeps coming up from people who are concerned about
> the code of conduct.
> I'm kind of confused, because I don't see it anywhere in the CoC, nor
> do I see people who tend to favor the CoC using the word offended.
> Who's ever
At 2019-07-02T08:42:43-0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> The tone is absolutely civilized.
>
> And yet, the cost to people who have to do this education again and
> again is really high.
Yes, and therein rests the utility of allies.
Speaking for myself I'd like to endorse the contributions to this
At 2019-06-28T11:48:18+0200, Gerardo Ballabio wrote:
> Hello all,
> I've just seen this on https://micronews.debian.org/ :
>
> "In support of #pridemonth, Debian changes its website logo. The
> Debian Project welcomes and encourages participation by everyone
>
At 2019-06-01T09:04:39+0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Are we then looking more closely at AMD-based machines given that
> those had less problems around speculative attacks?
To borrow a phrase from Christopher Hitchens, this comment gives a
hostage to fortune.
My team at work closely follows (and
At 2017-12-01T20:22:58+0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> Adam spoke about derivative users, not derivative developers, though.
[...]
> Our users are declared our priority, our downstreams aren't.
This is a false dilemma and I urge our community to reject it.
--
Regards,
Branden
signature.asc
Hi Adam,
I think you're probably already away of the factual portions of my
claims below, but I'm making them for the benefit of the broader
audience.
At 2017-12-01T18:11:34+0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > No, those derivatives are damage. While their hearts are in the right
> > > place, they
At 2017-10-30T17:01:43-0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I don't think you can take off any hats you do have when sending such
> mails. If you have a role in our account, antiharassment, conduct,
> listmaster, moderation, or other related processes, you can't really
> ever give that up when talking to
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 04:25:38PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
Thanks for your feedback! Been a while since we've chatted. :)
> On Fri, 2017-03-24 at 14:02:49 -0400, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > In returning my attention to current Debian packaging practices and
> >
25 matches
Mail list logo
